Legal anomie in the sphere of alternative (out-of-court) dispute resolution
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52028/rbadr.v6.i11.ART06.RUKeywords:
Legal anomie, Mediation, Alternative methods of dispute resolution, Conciliation procedures, Judicial conciliationAbstract
The study aims to identify the manifestations of legal anomie in the legal regulation of alternative conflict resolution in Russia’s legal system and, based on the analysis of regulation in foreign countries, to offer possible ways to minimize anomie manifestations. Dialectical, formal-legal and comparative-legal methods were used in the research process. The article considers the legal regulation of mediation in Russia in a comparative-legal aspect with foreign countries and analyzes the current legislation and practice of its implementation. The study also revealed anomalous manifestations at the institutional and other levels of Russia’s legal system. Declarative fixation of legal responsibility of mediators, as well as insufficiency of normative requirements to their professional level; absence of normative fixation of mandatory centralized bodies (associations) of mediators, which in turn generates insufficiency of corporate regulation of their activities. The study proposes to borrow foreign experience in the legal regulation of mediators’ certification. The study also makes proposals to improve the current legislation.
References
ALWAZNA R. Y. Culture and law: The cultural impact on Islamic legal statements and its implications for translation. International Journal of Legal Discourse, 2, 225-241, 2017.
ANDRADE SALAZAR, O.L., GALLEGOS GALLEGOS, S.B., ROSILLO ABARCA, L.V. The incidence of legal certainty and collection analysis by means of third-party intervention in Ecuadorian, Universidad y Sociedad, 14, 541–551, 2022.
ANDRADE SALAZAR, O.L., GALLEGOS GALLEGOS, S.B., ROSILLO ABARCA, L.V. The incidence of legal certainty and collection analysis by means of third-party intervention in Ecuadorian legislation, Universidad y Sociedad, 14, 541–551, 2021.
DAVYDENKO, D.L. Mediation procedures in the European legal tradition (M.: Infotropik Media, 2013).
DURKHEIM, E. On the separation of social labor. Method of research (M.: Nauka, 1990).
DURKHEIM, E. Suicide. Sociological study (M., 1994).
ELISEEVA, T.S. Foreign experience of legal regulation of alternative dispute resolution procedure, Legal World, 6, 20-21, 2015.
FERREIRA, D. B., GIOVANNINI, C., GROMOVA, E., SCHMIDT, G. R. Arbitration Chambers and trust in technology provider: Impacts of trust in technology intermediated dispute resolution proceedings, Technology in Society, 68, 101872, 2022.
FERREIRA D.B., SEVERO L. Multiparty Mediation as Solution for Urban Conflicts: A Case Analysis from Brazil. BRICS Law Journal. 8(3), 5-26, 2021. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2021-8-3-5-29
FERREIRA, D.B., GROMOVA, E.A. Hyperrealistic Jurisprudence: The Digital Age and the (Un) Certainty of Judge Analytics. Int J Semiot Law, 36, 2261–2281, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-023-10015-0
FILIPCZYK, H. ADR in Tax Disputes in Poland – The State of Play and Perspectives. Revista Brasileira de Alternative Dispute Resolution – RBADR, vol. 5, n. 10, pp. 205-220, 2023.
GAYDAENKO N.I. Mandatory mediation: the Italian experience // Court of Private Arbitration. 2012. No. 1 (79). Pp. 156-165.
GOLDIN A. Sobre los Derechos del Trabajo de América Latina: evolución y perspectivas // Trabajo y Derecho. 2019. No. 48. P. 12-23.
GUBAYDULLINA E.Kh. Foreign experience in the development of mediation as an out-of-court dispute resolution institution and its comparison with the experience of the Russian Federation. //Issues of economics and law. 2023. No. 9. Pp. 21-24.
GROMOVA, E.A., FERREIRA, D.B., BEGISHEV, I.R. ChatGPT and Other Intelligent Chatbots: Legal, Ethical and Dispute Resolution Concerns. Revista Brasileira de Alternative Dispute Resolution – RBADR, Belo Horizonte, ano 05, n. 10, p. 153-175, jul./dez. 2023. DOI: 10.52028/rbadr.v5i10.
GROMOVA E., IVANC T. Regulatory Sandboxes (Experimental Legal Regimes) for Digital Innovations in BRICS. BRICS Law Journal, 7(2), 10-36, 2020. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2020-7-2-10-36.
HALOUSH, H.A. The Liberty of Participation in Online Alternative Dispute Resolution Schemes. International Journal of Legal Information, 36(1), 102-117, 2008.
LIPINSKIY D.A., IVANOV A.A. Review of the concepts of legal anomie in foreign and Russian sociological and legal thought // State and law. 2023. No. 11. Pp. 49-63.
LIPINSKY D., BOLGOVA V., MUSATKINA A., KHUDOYKINA T. The notion of legal conflict // Conflict-Free Socio-Economic Systems: Perspectives and Contradictions. Bingley, West Yorkshire, 2019. P. 39-45.
LIPINSKY D.A., MUSATKINA A.A., BOLGOVA V.V., KHUDOYKINA T.V. Violation Of Law As A Legal Conflict // Conflict-Free Socio-Economic Systems: Perspectives and Contradictions. Bingley, West Yorkshire, 2019. P. 47-54.
MAIA, A., FLÓRIO, R.A. Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) / Mediação de Conflitos On-line Rumo à Singularidade Tecnológica? Revista Brasileira de Alternative Dispute Resolution – RBADR, vol. 5, n. 10, pp. 39-51, 2023.
MALKO A.V. Legal life of society, anomie and problems of unity of legal space in modern Russia // State and law. 2023. No. 3. Pp. 5-14.
MALKO, A.V., AFANASYEV, S.F., ERMAKOV, A.N. Standards for the provision of qualified legal assistance in the Russian Federation, State and law, 2, 166-171, 2019.
MALKO A.V., GURYEV, V.V., ZATONSKIY, V.A., KROTKOVA, N.V. Legal culture, legal policy and human rights (review of the materials of the scientific-practical conference), State and law, 2, 145-159, 2021.
MALKO, A.V., LIPINSKIY, D.A., MARKUNIN, R.S. Legal anomie in the legal system: theoretical and methodological foundations of research, Law enforcement, 3, 5-14, 2023.
MALKO, A.V., LIPINSKIY, D.A., ZRYACHKIN, A.N., MUSATKINA, A.A. Psychological aspects of deformation of legal consciousness and legal responsibility. Psychology and law, 140, 2022.
MALKO, A.V., TROFIMOV, V.V., ZATONSKIY, V.A. Once again about right and wrong, or why legal life is called legal life. State and law, 10, 55-66, 2020.
MARKOV, S.M. Chinese model of labor dispute mediation: a sociological perspective, International scientific research journal, 6, 40-47, 2015.
MERTON, R.K. Social theory and social structure (AST, 2006).
REUTOV, S. I. Mediation in modern legal practice: opportunities and prospects (Perm, 2015).
SOLHCHI, M.A., BAGHBANNO, F. Artificial Intelligence and Its Role in the Development of the Future of Arbitration, International Journal of Law in Changing World, 2(2), 56-76, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54934/ijlcw.v2i2.56.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
No royalties or other compensation shall be due for the publication of the works.
The opinions expressed by the authors of the articles and reviews are their sole responsibility.
