Mediation as an effective way to settle economic disputes
current experience and prospects for development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52028/rbadr.v6.i11.ART08.RUKeywords:
Dispute resolution, Alternative dispute resolution, Mediation, Voluntariness, Neutrality, MediatorAbstract
The mediation procedure is considered the most effective method of settling business conflicts in the system of alternative ways of dispute resolution through the prism of fundamental principles. The article reveals the advantages of settling cross-border economic disputes through mediation, including out-of-court procedures. The article examines doctrinal approaches to the mediation procedure, analyses the main problems of its unpopularity in the country and suggests ways to improve it and popularize it in Russian society through amendments to the mediation legislation, such as the legislative establishment of the term “mediation” and a uniform approach to the mediation procedure itself, including the requirements to the mediator’s identity and responsibility, as well as the exclusion from the legislation of the possibility of conducting mediation on a non-professional basis. The author pays special attention to the role of the judicial community in the development of mediation in the settlement of disputes in court.
References
BARUCH BUSH, R. The promise of mediation: responding to conflict through empowerment and recognition (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1994).
CLAYTON, G.; DORUSSEN, H. The Effectiveness of Mediation and Peacekeeping for Ending Conflict. Journal of Peace Research, vol. 59, n. 2, pp. 107-301, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343321990076.
BORISOVA, E.A. Alternative Dispute Resolution (Moscow: Gorodets, 2019).
DAN, D. Overcoming disagreements (SPB., 1994).
DAVYDOV, A. P. The basis of development as a sociocultural problem (to the question of mediation theory of the evolution of Western society). Vestnik of the Institute of Sociology, 24, 27-31, 2018.
DHIAULHAQ, A., DE BRUYN, T., GRITTEN, D. The Use and Effectiveness of Mediation in Forest and Land Conflict Transformation in Southeast Asia: Case Studies from Cambodia, Indonesia and Thailand. Environmental Science & Policy, vol. 45, pp. 132-145, 2015. DOI:10.1016/J. ENVSCI.2014.10.009.
FENG, Zhiyuan; LI, Yali. Natural Resource Curse and Fiscal Decentralization: Exploring the Mediating Role of Green Innovations and Market Regulations in G-20 Economies. Resources Policy, vol. 89, 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104556.
FERREIRA, D. B., GIOVANNINI, C., GROMOVA, E., SCHMIDT, G. R. Arbitration Chambers and trust in technology provider: Impacts of trust in technology intermediated dispute resolution proceedings”,Technology in Society, 68, 101872, 2022.
FERREIRA D.B., SEVERO L. Multiparty Mediation as Solution for Urban Conflicts: A Case Analysis from Brazil. BRICS Law Journal. 8(3), 5-26, 2021. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2021-8-3-5-29.
FERREIRA, D.B., GROMOVA, E.A. Hyperrealistic Jurisprudence: The Digital Age and the (Un) Certainty of Judge Analytics. Int J Semiot Law, 36, 2261–2281, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-023-10015-0.
GALINDO AYUDA, F. Algorithms, Sociology of Law and Justice. Journal of Digital Technologies and Law, 2(1), 34-45, 2024 https://doi.org/10.21202/jdtl.2024.3.
GROMOVA, E.A., FERREIRA, D.B., BEGISHEV, I.R. ChatGPT and Other Intelligent Chatbots: Legal, Ethical and Dispute Resolution Concerns. Revista Brasileira de Alternative Dispute Resolution – RBADR, Belo Horizonte, ano 05, n. 10, p. 153-175, jul./dez. 2023. DOI: 10.52028/rbadr.v5i10.
KARPENKO, A.D. Mediation terms as an element of practice development in Russia, Court of Arbitration, 3, 164, 2016.
KONOVA, F.R. Mediableness of civil-law disputes: correlation with jurisdiction (M., 2023).
POUND, R. Reasons for widespread dissatisfaction with the administration of justice, Mediation and Law, 1, 15-29, 2016.
PROKHODA, V.A. Trust of Russians in the national judicial-legal system (on the materials of sociological research) // Sociodynamika. - 2019. – No. 5. - p. 86-94.
RESHETNIKOVA, I.V. And again about mediation. What should it be in Russia?, Law, 1, 51-56, 2014.
ROZHKOVA, M.A., ELISEEV, N.G., SKVORTSOV, O.Y. Contract law: agreements on jurisdiction, international jurisdiction, conciliation procedure, arbitration (arbitration) and amicable agreement (Moscow: Statute, 2008).
SINIŠA, Vuković. International Multiparty Mediation: Prospects for a Coordinated Effort. Global Policy, vol. 10, n. S2, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12698.
SOLHCHI, M. A., & BAGHBANNO, F. Artificial Intelligence and Its Role in the Development of the Future of Arbitration, International Journal of Law in Changing World, 2(2), 56-76, 2023. DOI:https://doi.org/10.54934/ijlcw.v2i2.56
YAKOVLEV, V.F. Law of free application. Mediation and Law. Mediation and reconciliation, 9, 34, 2016.
YUDIN, A.V. Alternative ways of settlement and resolution of disputes in Russia: (Samara: Samara University Publishing House, 2021).
ZASEMKOVA, O. F. Singapore Convention on the Enforcement of Settlement Agreements reached as a result of mediation: from dream to reality?, Lex Russica, 3(148), 60-72, 2019.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
No royalties or other compensation shall be due for the publication of the works.
The opinions expressed by the authors of the articles and reviews are their sole responsibility.
