Legal liability of mediators
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52028/rbadr.v6.i11.ART10.RUKeywords:
Mediator, Mediation, Positive liability, Negative liability, Legal offense, Legal anomie, Mediation institutionAbstract
The aim of the research is to identify possible gaps in the regulation of the legal liability of mediators and parties to the mediation process. The research methodology involved the use of dialectical, formal-legal, and comparative legal methods, as well as techniques of analysis and synthesis, deduction and induction, philosophical laws of unity and struggle of opposites, denial of negation, and others. In the main content, the legal liability of mediators is analyzed from the perspective of its positive and negative components, and the legal character of various manifestations of the legal liability of mediators and their place in the modern system of legal liability is identified. Significant attention is paid to the positive liability of mediators and its legal character is justified. In conclusion it is clarified that the institution of mediation as a whole and the legal liability of mediators in Russia are in the process of formation. It is proven that the legal liability of mediators has a public-law rather than a private-law character. Legal gaps in the regulation of the legal liability of mediators, as well as other parties to the mediation process, are identified, and ways to eliminate them are proposed.
References
ALWAZNA R. Y. Culture and law: The cultural impact on Islamic legal statements and its implications for translation. International Journal of Legal Discourse, 2, 225-241, 2017.
ANDRADE SALAZAR, O.L., GALLEGOS GALLEGOS, S.B., ROSILLO ABARCA, L.V. The incidence of legal certainty and collection analysis by means of third-party intervention in Ecuadorian legislation, Universidad y Sociedad, 14, 541–551, 2021.
ERMAKOVA, E.P. Features of Online Settlement of Consumer Disputes by e-commerce Platforms in the People’s Republic of China. Journal of Digital Technologies and Law, 1(3), 691-711, 2023. https://doi.org/10.21202/jdtl.2023.30.
FERREIRA, D. B., GIOVANNINI, C., GROMOVA, E., SCHMIDT, G. R. Arbitration Chambers and trust in technology provider: Impacts of trust in technology intermediated dispute resolution proceedings, Technology in Society, 68, 101872, 2022.
FERREIRA D.B., SEVERO L. Multiparty Mediation as Solution for Urban Conflicts: A Case Analysis from Brazil. BRICS Law Journal. 8(3), 5-26, 2021. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2021-8-3-5-29.
FERREIRA, D.B., GROMOVA, E.A. Hyperrealistic Jurisprudence: The Digital Age and the (Un) Certainty of Judge Analytics. Int J Semiot Law, 36, 2261–2281, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-023-10015-0.
FILIPCZYK, H. ADR in Tax Disputes in Poland – The State of Play and Perspectives. Revista Brasileira de Alternative Dispute Resolution – RBADR, vol. 5, n. 10, pp. 205-220, 2023.
GROMOVA, E.A., FERREIRA, D.B., BEGISHEV, I.R. ChatGPT and Other Intelligent Chatbots: Legal, Ethical and Dispute Resolution Concerns. Revista Brasileira de Alternative Dispute Resolution – RBADR, Belo Horizonte, ano 05, n. 10, p. 153-175, jul./dez. 2023. DOI: 10.52028/rbadr.v5i10.
HALOUSH, H.A. The Liberty of Participation in Online Alternative Dispute Resolution Schemes. International Journal of Legal Information, 36(1), 102-117, 2008.
HAYEK, F.A. Law, Legislation and Liberty: a New Statement of the Liberal Principles and Political Economy (New York: Routledge, 2003).
KHACHATUROV, R.L., YAGUDYAN, R.G. Legal responsibility (Togliatti: MABiBD, 1995).
KHUZHIN, A.M., ODINOKOVA, A.V. Prospects for the study of increased legal responsibility, Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, 3, 69-75, 2020.
LIPINSKY, D., BOLGOVA, V., MUSATKINA, A., KHUDOYKINA, T. The notion of legal conflict, Conflict-Free Socio-Economic Systems: Perspectives and Contradictions (Bingley, West Yorkshire, 2019).
LIPINSKY, D.A. IVANOV, A.A. Review of the concepts of legal anomie in foreign and domestic sociological and legal thought, State and Law, 11, 49-63, 2023.
LIPINSKY, D.A. Social Bases of Positive Responsibility, Sententia. European of Humanities and Social Sciences, 3, 41-49, 2015.
MAIA, A., FLÓRIO, R.A. Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) / Mediação de Conflitos On-line Rumo à Singularidade Tecnológica? Revista Brasileira de Alternative Dispute Resolution – RBADR, vol. 5, n. 10, pp. 39-51, 2023.
MAKAREIKO, N.V., LIPINSKY, D.A. Problems of establishing the limits of procedural responsibility, Herald of Civil Procedure, 1, 107-118, 2021.
MARKUNIN, R.S. The system of legal responsibility of public authorities: principles of formation, State and Law, 6, 35-42, 2020.
MALKO, A.V., LIPINSKY, D.A., MARKUNIN, R.S. Positive and negative responsibility as a manifestation of dialectical logic in legal research, State and Law, 1, 17-25, 2021.
MALKO, A.V., LIPINSKY, D.A., MARKUNIN, R.S. Positive and negative responsibility as a manifestation of dialectical logic in legal research, State and Law, 12, 24-34, 2021.
MALKO A.V., LIPINSKY D.A., MARKUNIN R.S., MUSATKINA A.A. Legal responsibility in the legal system of Russia: some studies and prospects of the project, State and Law, 12, 24-34, 2021.
MALKO, A.V., LIPINSKY, D.A., ZRYACHKIN, A.N, MUSATKINA, A.A. Psychological aspects of deformation of legal consciousness and legal responsibility, Psychology and Law, 4, 140-153, 2022.
MALKO, A.V., TROFIMOV, V.V., ZATONSKY, V.A. Once again about right and wrong, or why legal life is called legal, State and Law, 11, 49-57, 2020.
POPOVA, Yu.P. Legal responsibility of mediators, Proceedings of the conference “Development of world justice in modern conditions: problems and prospects” (Tyumen, 2014).
SCHMUTZER, R. Probleme der Verantwortung aus arbeisrechtlicher Sicht, Staat und Recht, 3, 29–35, 1973.
SCHNEIDER, W. Zum Verhaltnis von Haftung und Verantwortlichkeit, Staat und Recht, 10–11, 37–45, 1972.
SHURENKOVA, S.S. To the question of the responsibility of mediators: classical and online mediation, Law and Practice, 3, 207-210, 2023.
SOLHCHI, M.A., BAGHBANNO, F. Artificial Intelligence and Its Role in the Development of the Future of Arbitration, International Journal of Law in Changing World, 2(2), 56-76, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54934/ijlcw.v2i2.56.
SPAAK, T. Legal positivism, law’s normativity, and the normative force of legal justification, Ratio Juris, 4, 469–485, 2003.
STILLER, G. Rechtliche Sanktionen Probieme ihrer Ausgestaltung und Anwendung, Neue Justiz, 8, 219–237, 1975.
TOLSTIK, V.A. Legal responsibility and punishment: the problem of correlation, State and Law, 10, 63-67, 2023.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
No royalties or other compensation shall be due for the publication of the works.
The opinions expressed by the authors of the articles and reviews are their sole responsibility.
