Authentication and verification in arbitration proceedings
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52028/rbadr.v6.i11.ART12.RUKeywords:
Authentication, Verification, Arbitration proceedings, Arbitration, Civil procedure, DisputeAbstract
The extensive and intensive development of digital technologies is a constant process that co-occurs with the same steady increase in the level of social significance of the justice process. One of the cornerstones in integrating individual technological solutions into the justice administration ecosystem is the development of technologies that can carry out many procedures remotely. These problems indicate a real need to develop a comprehensive scientific understanding of verification and authentication. This study aims to analyze the concepts of verification and authentication in the context of modern arbitration proceedings in Russia and define issues arising from the digitalization of procedural relations. The authors concluded on the possibility of convergence of arbitration institutions and state courts, the creation of a unified information system aimed at increasing the accessibility of arbitration proceedings, which correlates with the reduction of judicial workload in state courts, as well as the prospects of integration of authentication and verification mechanisms in arbitration proceedings.
References
ABOVA, T. E. Arbitration court in the judicial system of Russia, State and Law, 9, 45-50, 2000.
ARISTOTLE. Ethics. Politics. Rhetoric. Poetics. Categories (Minsk: Literature, 1998).
ASHFA, D. M. Compliance in competition law: problems of theory and practice, Bulletin of O.E. Kutafin University, 7 (95), 50-57, 2022.
BEVZENKO, R. S. ZAINULLIN, S.B. KURSKOVA O.N. Scientific and practical commentary to the Federal Law of the Russian Federation “On Arbitration Courts in the Russian Federation” (Moscow: Delovoy dvor, 2011).
CALAP DELPHI, A. War and the question of arbitration (500–400 BCE), Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 1, 12-21, 2023.
COHEN, S., MORRIL, M. Fordham International Arbitration & Mediation Conference Issue: a Call to Cyberarms: the International Arbitrator’s Duty to Avoid Digital Intrusion, Fordham International Law Journal, 40, 981-986, 2016.
ERMAKOVA, E. P. Features of Online Settlement of Consumer Disputes by e-commerce Platforms in the People’s Republic of China. Journal of Digital Technologies and Law, 1(3), 691-711, 2023. https://doi.org/10.21202/jdtl.2023.30.
ERSHOVA, I. V., YENKOVA, E.E. Sanction Compliance, or Intrafirm Risk Management from Restrictions, Actual Issues of Russian Law, 8 (141), 93-103, 2022.
FERREIRA, D. B., GIOVANNINI, C., GROMOVA, E., SCHMIDT, G. R. Arbitration Chambers and trust in technology provider: Impacts of trust in technology intermediated dispute resolution proceedings, Technology in Society, 68, 101872, 2022.
FERREIRA D. B., SEVERO L. Multiparty Mediation as Solution for Urban Conflicts: A Case Analysis from Brazil. BRICS Law Journal. 8(3), 5-26, 2021. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2021-8-3-5-29.
FERREIRA, D. B., GROMOVA, E.A. Hyperrealistic Jurisprudence: The Digital Age and the (Un) Certainty of Judge Analytics. Int J Semiot Law, 36, 2261–2281, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-023-10015-0.
FILIPCZYK, H. ADR in Tax Disputes in Poland – The State of Play and Perspectives. Revista Brasileira de Alternative Dispute Resolution – RBADR, vol. 5, n. 10, pp. 205-220, 2023.
GABOV, A. V., GAIDAENKO-SHER, N. I., GANICHEVA, E.S., ZHUIKOV V.M. Violation of public policy as a ground for refusal to recognize and enforce an international commercial arbitration award, The Herald of Civil Procedure, 7,5, 45-68, 2017.
GARMAEV, Y. P., IVANOV, E.A., MARKUNTSOV, S.A. On the formation of an interdisciplinary concept of anti-corruption compliance in the Russian Federation, Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 4, 106-128, 2020.
GERASIMENKO, YU. V., TEREKHOVA, L. A. On the new procedure for creating an arbitration institution (introductory article to the review), Law Enforcement, 2, 207-211, 2017.
GREBELSKY, A.V. Electronic evidence in international commercial arbitration, Law, 10, 59-70, 2015.
GROMOVA, E.A., FERREIRA, D. B., BEGISHEV, I.R. ChatGPT and Other Intelligent Chatbots: Legal,Ethical and Dispute Resolution Concerns. Revista Brasileira de Alternative Dispute Resolution – RBADR, Belo Horizonte, ano 05, n. 10, p. 153-175, jul./dez. 2023. DOI: 10.52028/rbadr.v5i10.
KABATOV, V.A. Applicable law in dispute resolution in the International Commercial Arbitration Court at the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of the Russian Federation, Economics and Law, 6, 105-109, 1998.
KAZACHENOK, S. Y., ANTIPOVA, E. A. Unification of arbitration agreement terminology in the process of international integration, Legal Concept, 2,150-157, 2014.
KUROCHKIN, S. A. The concept and system of principles of arbitration proceedings, Arbitration and Civil Procedure, 11, 7-12, 2005.
MAKOLKIN, N. N. Some approaches to the legal interpretation of the terms verification and authentication, Laplage Em Revista, 6, 185-189, 2020.
MOLCHANOV, V. V. Prejudice in arbitration (arbitration proceedings), Legislation, 6, 43-51, 2022.
PAVLOV, R. V. On the limits of state influence on the procedure for creating permanent arbitration institutions in Russia, Vestnik VSU. Ser. Law, 3 (38), 126-132, 2019.
PIEGDOŃ, M. Roman Arbitration in the Greek Oikumene in the Third–Second Century BCE: Some Observations, [in:] Diplomacy and Inter-State Relations in the Hellenistic World, ELECTRUM vol. XXV, ed. E. Dąbrowa, (Kraków 2018).
POPOV, E.V. Challenges of the digital and information age and arbitration reform in Russia, The Act, 9, 91-101, 2017.
ROSENBERG, M. G. From the practice of the ICAC at the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of the Russian Federation, Economics and Law, 5, 109-118, 2009.
ROSENBERG, M.G. From the practice of the International Commercial Arbitration Court at the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of the Russian Federation for 2008, Economics and Law, 8, 101-116, 2008.
ROSENBERG, M. G. International contract and foreign law in the practice of the International Commercial Arbitration Court (M.: Statut, 2000).
ROSENBERG, M. G. International sale of goods: commentary on legal regulation and dispute resolution practice. 4th ed., revised and supplemented (M.: Statut, 2010).
ROSENBERG, M. G. Limitation in international commercial turnover: practice of application (Moscow: Statut, 1999).
SAKHNOVA, T.V. Reform of civilistic process: problems and prospects, State and Law, 9, 1997.
SEVASTYANOV, G. V. The soul of Russian arbitration, Arbitration Court, 2 (126), 9-10, 2021.
SHOEMAKER, G. Ancient Greek arbitration: practices, failures, and the decline of the Greek world, International Law and Politics, 55, 24-29, 2023.
SKVORTSOV, O. Yu. System of principles of arbitration proceedings, The Bulletin of St. Petersburg State University. Ser. 14. Law, 3, 100-103, 2013.
SKVORTSOV, O.Yu. The principle of confidentiality of arbitration proceedings and its correlation with related institutions of public law // Bulletin of St. Petersburg State University. Ser. 14. Law, 4, 181-184, 2014.
SOLHCHI, M. A., BAGHBANNO, F. Artificial Intelligence and Its Role in the Development of the Future of Arbitration, International Journal of Law in Changing World, 2(2), 56-76, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54934/ijlcw.v2i2.56.
VALEEV, D. H., ZAITSEV, A.I., FETYUKHIN, M.V. Commentary to the Federal Law “On Arbitration Courts in the Russian Federation”, Herald of Civil Procedure, 1, 104-127, 2016.
WAINCYMER, J. Procedure and Evidence in International Arbitration (Hague, Wolters Kluwer, 2012).
YARKOV, V. V. Arbitration process (M., 2012).
ZHILIN, G. A. Justice in civil cases: actual issues (M., 2010).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
No royalties or other compensation shall be due for the publication of the works.
The opinions expressed by the authors of the articles and reviews are their sole responsibility.
