The development of arbitration proceedings in Russia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52028/rbadr.v6.i11.ART15.RUKeywords:
Arbitral proceedings, Development, Arbitration, Alternative dispute resolution, Regulation disputesAbstract
The article reviews the general development of arbitration proceedings in the Russian Federation. The paper’s main aim is to review the general development of arbitration proceedings in the Russian Federation. Using the legal comparative method allowed us to study national and foreign legislation to formulate conclusions about developing the arbitration procedure in Russian legislation. The application of the formal legal analysis made it possible to understand the concept of the arbitration court from a Russian perspective. A brief historical excursion of the development of arbitration proceedings, starting from the twelfth century, was made to achieve the paper’s aim. Following that, the author delves into the 2016 arbitration reform, its significance and the current state of arbitration in Russia. The author briefly describes and analyzes permanent arbitration institutions operating in the Russian Federation. At the end of the article, the author discusses the current trends in the development of arbitration and the challenges facing arbitration proceedings in Russia.
References
FARHTDINOV, YA.F. The role of arbitration courts in the system of bodies for the protection of violated or challenged civil rights, Arbitration Court, 5/6, 35-39, 2001.
FERREIRA, D. B., GIOVANNINI, C., GROMOVA, E., SCHMIDT, G. R. Arbitration Chambers and trust in technology provider: Impacts of trust in technology intermediated dispute resolution proceedings, Technology in Society, 68, 101872, 2022.
FERREIRA D.B., SEVERO L. Multiparty Mediation as Solution for Urban Conflicts: A Case Analysis from Brazil. BRICS Law Journal. 8(3), 5-26, 2021. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2021-8-3-5-29.
FILIPCZYK, H. ADR in Tax Disputes in Poland – The State of Play and Perspectives. Revista Brasileira de Alternative Dispute Resolution – RBADR, vol. 5, n. 10, pp. 205-220, 2023.
GROMOVA, E., IVANC, T. Regulatory Sandboxes (Experimental Legal Regimes) for Digital Innovations in BRICS. BRICS Law Journal, 7(2), 10-36, 2020. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2020-7-2-10-36.
HALOUSH, H.A. The Liberty of Participation in Online Alternative Dispute Resolution Schemes. International Journal of Legal Information, 36(1), 102-117, 2008.
KALLISTRATOVA, R.F. Alternative legal proceedings for the resolution of economic disputes, Judicial system of Russia (M., 2000).
KARABELNIKOV, B.R. Recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards: Scientific and practical commentary to the New York Convention (Moscow: CJSC, “Yustitsinform”, 2001).
LEBEDEV, K.K. Legal service of business (corporate lawyer) (M., 2001).
MAIA, A., FLÓRIO, R.A. Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) / Mediação de Conflitos On-line Rumo à Singularidade Tecnológica? Revista Brasileira de Alternative Dispute Resolution – RBADR, vol. 5, n. 10, pp. 39-51, 2023.
MURANOV, A.I. “Russian’ Institute of modern arbitration and “Russian” arbitration center: a study of their role in the arbitration sphere in the Russian Federation. GONGO-structures? Declarations and Reality. How the vertical of power works in arbitration (M., 2020).
PRESCOTT, J.J.; SPIER, Kathryn E.; YOON, Albert. Trial and Settlement: A Study of High-Low Agreements. The Journal of Law & Economics, vol. 57, n. 3, p. 699-746, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/677297.
SOLHCHI, M.A., BAGHBANNO, F. Artificial Intelligence and Its Role in the Development of the Future of Arbitration, International Journal of Law in Changing World, 2(2), 56-76, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54934/ijlcw.v2i2.56.
VINOGRADOVA, E.A. Legal bases of organization and activity of the arbitration court (M., 2003).
VITSYN, A.I. Arbitration court on Russian law, historical and dogmatic reasoning (M., 1856). 114 p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
No royalties or other compensation shall be due for the publication of the works.
The opinions expressed by the authors of the articles and reviews are their sole responsibility.