The Impact of Digital Technologies on Alternative Dispute Resolution
Schlagworte:
ADR, Efficiency Digital, Technology ADRAbstract
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) has emerged as a viable and efficient means of resolving disputes outside of traditional litigation. As digital technologies continue to advance, they have also begun to revolutionize various aspects of ADR processes. This research paper examines the intersection of digital technologies and alternative dispute resolution, exploring their impact on the efficiency, accessibility, and effectiveness of dispute resolution mechanisms. The study investigates the incorporation of digital technologies such as online dispute resolution platforms, virtual hearings, data analytics, and blockchain in ADR processes. Additionally, it discusses the potential benefits and challenges associated with the integration of these technologies and provides insights into the future of ADR in the digital era.
Literaturhinweise
Adams, S. A. Mediation in the Digital Age: E-Mediation and its Potential for Expansion. Texas Tech Law Review, v.51(2), p.515-540,2018..Retrieved from https://texastechlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/1.-Volume-51-Masthead.pdf
Barton, Debra, and Alanah Wotton. Online Dispute Resolution: The Way Forward? The Alternative Law Journal v.40, no. 3 ,p. 157-163,2015..Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/digital/consumer/1878940.pdf
Ben-David Assael, The Impact of Digital Technologies on Dispute Resolution Processes, Negotiation Journal v.3, no. 3 ,p.241-268, 2017.
Berti, A. M., & Hanzaee, K. H. (2020). The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Online Dispute Resolution. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. P.138-147,2020.Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361381840_
Bravo, M. C., & Kim, B. J. Online Dispute Resolution: From Theory to Practice. European Business Organization Law Review, v.21(1), p.21-52, 2020.
Catá Backer, L. Online Dispute Resolution and the Development of Digital Business Communities. Maryland Journal of International Law, v.33(2), p.187-218,2018.
Chen, Z., & Rothenberg, J. Toward fair, efficient, and accountable online dispute resolution. Association for Computing Machinery, v.29(3), p.70-73,2019.
Winkler, Matteo and Schinazi, Mikael, ‘No Longer “Pale, Male, and Stale”? Approaching Diversity and Inclusiveness in International Arbitration’ Forthcoming in Liber Amicorum Guillermo Aguillar Alvarez, 2021 , Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3776738 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3776738
Choi, G. K., & Lee, J. H. Blockchain Technology in Online Dispute Resolution. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Electronic Commerce ,p. 173-178, 2018.
Cortes, Pablo, and Ethan Katsh. The Impact of Information Technology on the Dispute Resolution Process. Fordham Law Review v.79, no. 3,p.1021-1069, 2010.
Cortez, N. G., & Johnston, E. Can online dispute resolution ever be fair? Evidence from eBay’s Online Dispute Resolution system. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 131(Part A), p.196-216, 2016.
De Filippi, P., & Wright, A. Blockchain and the Law: The Rule of Code. Harvard University Press, 2018.
de Silva, C. R. Artificial Intelligence and Alternative Dispute Resolution. Journal of Dispute Resolution, v.2, p.25-59, 2019.
Devitt, A., & Arlidge, D. (2018). Online Dispute Resolution. Oxford University Press.
Ellis, A. ADR and ODR in the Digital Age: A Case for Preserving Party Autonomy. Negotiation Journal, v.35(1), p.67-93, 2019.
Feeney, Mary K. Online Dispute Resolution, and the Future of Consumer Protection. Dispute Resolution Journal v.65, no. 1,p. 12-18, 2010.
Galton, L. Online Dispute Resolution: An Essential Tool for Mediators in the Digital Age. In ICC Mediation Conference, 2017.
Gospodinov, G., & Anoyrkati, E. Blockchain-based Online Dispute Resolution System for Trustless and Transparent E-commerce Transactions. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems and Applications ,pp. 1-6, 2019.
Hecht, J., & Moore, M. The Rise of Online Dispute Resolution: An Examination of the Effectiveness of Web-based Dispute Resolution Systems. International Journal of Online Dispute Resolution,v. 6(2), p.225-247, 2019.
Katsh, E. M., & Rifkin, J. Online Dispute Resolution: Resolving Conflicts in Cyberspace. JosseyBass, 2001.
Katsh, E., & Rabinovich-Einy, O.. Digital Justice: Technology and the Internet of Disputes. Oxford University Press, 2017.
Katsh, E., & Rifkin, J. Online dispute resolution: Resolving conflicts in cyberspace. Jossey-Bass,
Klippel, A., Thomas, J., & Vila, M. 3D Models and Virtual Reality as Tools for Online Dispute Resolution. Journal of Dispute Resolution, v.2,p.289-308,2018.
Kressel, K., & Soderlund, N. A comparison of ADR, 2018.
Lodder, A. R., & Zeleznikow, J. Enhanced dispute resolution through the use of technology. Law Technology Journal, v.3(1), p.1-10, 2009.
Menkel-Meadow, C., & Schneider, A. K. Dispute resolution in the digital age. Negotiation Journal, v.16(4), p.345-365, 2000.
Rule, C. The impact of technology on alternative dispute resolution. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, v.28, p.547-596, 2013.
Rule, C. Online dispute resolution for business: B2B, e-commerce, consumer, employment, insurance, and other commercial conflicts in the digital age. Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, 2017.
Rule, Colin, and Ethan Katsh. E-Commerce and Online Dispute Resolution: Beyond eBay. Negotiation Journal v.23, no. 4 ,p.431-452, 2007.
Rule, Colin. Technology and Mediation. Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal v.26, no. 4 ,p.236-248, 2015.
Schmidt, M Online Dispute Resolution: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Negotiation Journal, v.33(4), p.371-395, 2017.
Schmitz, Amy J., and Colin Rule. “The New Handshake: Where We Are Now. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution v.29, no. 3 ,p.619-628, 2014.
Stranieri, A., & Zeleznikow, From alternative dispute resolution to online dispute resolution: The progression of dispute resolution processes and the impact of the Internet on dispute resolution systems. Journal of Information Technology & Justice, v.1(1), p.9-24, 2006.
Susskind, Richard. Online Dispute Resolution: Theory and Practice. Journal of Information, Law & Technology v.1, p.1-17, 2003.
Vladimirovich, M.A ,Sergeevich,E.K , Alternative dispute resolution in digital government. Revista Brasileira de Alternative Dispute Resolution – RBADR, v.4, nº 7, p.119-146, 2022.
Yang, Kuo-Chang, and Su-Feng Chen. The Development and Future Trends of Online Dispute Resolution: A Socio-Legal Perspective. Information & Communications Technology Law v.24, no. 3, p.258-279, 2015.
Zeleznikow, J., & Bellucci, E. Web-based dispute resolution: the potential of technology for resolving legal disputes. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, v.22(1), p.1-35, 2014.
Zeleznikow, John. Online Dispute Resolution: Theoretical and Practical Issues. Journal of Information, Law & Technology, v.2 p.91-112, 2003 https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/15470488.pdf
Stephen B. Goldberg, Frank E.A. Sander, et.al., Dispute Resolution: Negotiation, Mediation and Other Processes (Aspen Law and Business, New York, 3rd edn., 1999)
FISS, Owen. Against Settlement. Yale Law Journal, v.93, n.1073, 1983-1984
Chakraborty,Anirban; Sarker,Shuvro. Resolving disputes with an healing effect: the practice of mediation in India, Revista Brasileira De Alternative Dispute Resolution – RBADR, v.4, nº 8,, p.61-84, 2023.
Naval Sharma & Shriya Luke, Mandatory Mediation Prescribed Before Filing of Commercial Suits, Mondaq (available at https://www.mondaq.com/india/arbitration-disputeresolution/729584/mandatorymediation-prescribed-prior-to-filing-of-commercial-suits).
Downloads
Veröffentlicht
Ausgabe
Rubrik
Lizenz
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Brasileira de Alternative Dispute Resolution - Brazilian Journal of Alternative Dispute Resolution - RBADR
Dieses Werk steht unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International.
No royalties or other compensation shall be due for the publication of the works.
The opinions expressed by the authors of the articles and reviews are their sole responsibility.
