Right to be heard as a part of due process of law in arbitration proceedings
current challenges and lessons for Ukraine
Keywords:
Due Process of Law, Arbitration Agreement, International Commercial ArbitrationAbstract
International commercial arbitration as a type of alternative dispute resolution is gaining popularity quite rapidly and its use is not the result of a lack of trust in national courts, but a desire to resolve a dispute as soon as possible with the least amount of time and the ability to manage the process independently. This can be considered one of the most important reasons for choosing arbitration, as the events of the last 5 years in the world (such as the Pandemic, Climate change) have demonstrated to everyone the importance of prompt communication and, as a result, the importance of introducing various forms of arbitration proceedings. Such forms include direct (traditional) consideration of the case in the arbitration courtroom, online and hybrid forms. And in this aspect, a fairly reasonable question arises as to whether such forms of arbitration proceedings comply with the due process of law. The article will analyze the doctrinal approaches of both Ukrainian and foreign legal schools and examples of the law enforcement practice of national courts on this problematic issue. In addition, the article will analyze the Ukrainian legislation on the compliance of arbitration proceedings with due process of law and propose amendments to the current legislation. The article consists of 3 main parts which are logically interrelated and methodologically structured. The first part is devoted to the analysis of the main approaches to due process of law, which is revealed through the prism of comparative legal analysis of doctrinal concepts and analysis of law enforcement practice of national and arbitration courts. The second part reveals the essence of such a structural element of the due process of law in arbitration proceedings as the right to be heard, which plays a key role not only in the course of international commercial arbitration proceedings, but also in the procedure for recognition and enforcement of international commercial arbitration awards by national courts. The last section reveals the peculiarities of due process in virtual arbitration as a specific mechanism of alternative dispute resolution. Using a comparative legal analysis of arbitration practice and the current rules of the leading arbitration institutions, the author concludes that the introduction of online mechanisms in arbitration proceedings is effective.
References
Association of Architects of Australia; ex parte Municipal Officers Association of Australia [1989] HCA 13 (21 February 1989) (Brennan, Dawson and Gaudron JJ.) URL: https://jade.io/article/67484?at.p=index
Belgian Judicial Code https://www.uv.es/medarb/observatorio/leyes–arbitraje/europa–resto/belgica–judicial–code–arbitration–2013.pdf
CA 100/2006, Soh Beng Tee & Co Pte Ltd. v Fairmount Development Pte Ltd URL: https://documents–dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/V07/881/97/PDF/V0788197.pdf?OpenElement
“Compendium of Comments for Working Paper # 4 relating to Proposed Amendments to the ICSIO Arbitration Rules,” ICSID, March 23 2021. URL: https://icsid.worldbank.org/sites/default/files/amendments/Compendium%20of%20State%20Comments%20on%20Proposed%20Amendments%20to%20the%20ICSID%20Rules%20–WP%20%23%204%20–%20As%20of%202021.03.23.pdf
Convention on the Execution of Foreign Arbitral Awards. Geneva, 26 September 1927. URL: https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/LON/Volume%2092/v92.pdf
The Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, New York, 1958. URL: https://icac.org.ua/wp–content/uploads/Text–of–UN–convention_New– York– 1958– 4.pdf.
Does a Right to a Physical Hearing Exist in International Arbitration? https://cdn.arbitration–icca.org/s3fspublic/document/media_document/ICCA_Reports_no_10_Right_to_a_Physical_Hearing_final_amended_7Nov2022.pdf
DRAHOZAL, Christopher R. The New York Convention and the American Federal System. Revista Brasileira de Alternative Dispute Resolution, vol. 1, nº 1, pp. 37– 53, 2019.
ELISAVETSKY, A., MARUN, M. La tecnologia aplicada a la resolución de conflictos: su comprensión para la eficiência de las ODR y para su proyección en Latinoamérica. Revista Brasileira de Alternative Dispute Resolution – RBADR, vol. 2, nº 3, pp. 51– 70, 2020.
FERREIRA, D.B., GROMOVA, E. FARIAS, B., GIOVANNINI, C. Online Sports Betting in Brazil and conflict solution clauses. Revista Brasileira de Alternative Dispute Resolution – RBADR, vol. 4, nº 7, pp. 75– 87, 2022.
FERREIRA, D.B., GIOVANNINI, C., GROMOVA, E., SCHMIDT, G. Arbitration chambers and trust in technology provider: Impacts of trust in technology intermediated dispute resolution proceedings, Technology in Society 68,101872, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101872.
FERREIRA, D.B., GIOVANNINI, C., GROMOVA, E., FERREIRA, J.B. Arbitration chambers and technology: Witness tampering and perceived effectiveness in videoconferenced dispute resolution proceedings. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, vol. 31, nº 1, pp. 75– 90, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaad012.
Franco Ferrari, Friedrich Jakob Rosenfeld, et al., ‘Chapter 1: General Report’, Due Process as a Limit to Discretion in International Commercial Arbitration, (© Kluwer Law International; Kluwer Law International 2020) p. 1
Frederick F. Shauer, English Natural Justice and American Due Process: An Analytical Comparison, 18 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 47 (1976), URL: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr/ vol18/ iss1/3
Gas & Fuel Corporation of Victoria v Wood Hall Ltd & Leonard Pipeline Contractors Ltd [1978] URL: https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/gas–and–fuel–corporation–of–victoria–v–wood–hall–ltd–and–leonard-pipeline–contractors–ltd–1978–vicrp–41–1978–vr–385–11–april–1978/
ICC Arbitration Rules 2021 https://iccwbo.org/dispute–resolution/dispute–resolution-services/arbitration/rules–procedure/2021–arbitration–rules/#block–accordion–26
Jaguar Energy Guatemala LLC and AEI Guatemala Jaguar Ltd v. China Machine New Energy Corporation, ICC Case No. 20013/CYK, Judgment of the Court of Appeal of Singapore [2020] SGCA 12, 28 février 2020
Judgment of the Civil Court of Cassation of 26.01.2023 in case No. 824/253/21. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/108686078
Judgment of the Fifth Administrative Court of Appeal of 08.02.2022 in case 420/13647/21. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/103202606
Judgment of the Administrative Court of Cassation dated 25.07.2019 in case No. 826/13000/18. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/83331117
Judgment of the Kyiv Court of Appeal of 25.06.2021 in case No. 824/75/21 URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/97910473
Judgment of the Kyiv Court of Appeal of 15.11.2021 in case 824/217/21 URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/101806306
Lucy Reed, Ab(use) of due process: sword vs shield, Arbitration International, Volume 33, Issue 3, September 2017, Pages 361–377, https://doi.org/10.1093/arbint/aix022
Note to parties and arbitral tribunals on the conduct of the arbitration under the ICC Rules of Arbitration https://iccwbo.org/wp–content/uploads/sites/3/2020/12/icc–note–to–parties–and–arbitral–tribunals–on–the–conduct–of–arbitration–english–2021.pdf
OLG Frankfurt, Beschluss vom 16. Januar 2014 – 26 Sch 2/13. URL: https://juris.de/perma?d=KORE561632014
OLG Frankfurt, Beschluss vom 24. Januar 2022 – 26 Sch 14/21 URL: https://juris.de/perma?d=KORE249042022
Proposals for Amendment to ICSID Hides – Working Paper # 5,” ICSID, June 15, 2021, para. 62 URL: https://icsid.worldbank.org/sites/default/files/publications/WP%205–Volume1–ENG–FINAL.pdf
Singapore Arbitration Act 2001 URL: https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/AA2001
Singapore / 30 October 2014 / Singapore, High Court / Triulzi Cesare SRL v. Xinyi Group (Glass) Co Ltd / [2014] SGHC 220
Spanish Arbitration Act 2011 URL: https://www.mjusticia.gob.es/es/AreaTematica/DocumentacionPublicaciones/Documents/Act_on_arbitration_%28Ley_60_2003__de_arbitraje%29.PDF
Sukhbir Singh v. Hindustan Petroleum Corp, 2020 URL: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/86294741/
Triulzi Cesaresiu, v. Xinyi Group (Glass) Co Ltd, [2014] SGHC 220. URL: https://www.uncitral.org/docs/clout/SGP/SGP_301014_FT.pdf#
Tsuvina T.A. Principle of the Right to Be Heard in Civil Procedure: ELI/UNIDROIT Model European Rules of Civil Procedure, Case Law of the ECtHR and National Context. Bull. Taras Shevchenko Nat’l U. Kyiv Legal Stud. 2022. Nº 2(121). C. 88– 96
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
No royalties or other compensation shall be due for the publication of the works.
The opinions expressed by the authors of the articles and reviews are their sole responsibility.