E-Musyawarah
innovative ADR for resolving administrative disputes outside the court from the perspective of Lawrence M. Friedman’s legal system theory
Palabras clave:
Indonesia, E-Musyawarah, Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), Administrative Dispute Resolution, Legal System Theory, Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in LawResumen
The continuous development of administrative disputes has highlighted the need for Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) to resolve administrative disputes outside the court. The concept of E-Musyawarah represents a form of ADR that offers new legal perspectives. The data collection method used in this research is secondary data obtained through library research, with the theoretical approach used being the legal system theory by Friedman. The concept of E-Musyawarah as an ADR for resolving administrative disputes outside the court reflects the trend of information and communication technology being used to facilitate dispute resolution outside the judiciary. The resolution of E-Musyawarah is agreed upon with electronic signatures registered in the E-Court to have the same legal standing as decisions by the Administrative Court. This concept is accompanied by the legal system theory by Lawrence M. Friedman. The legal challenge faced by the concept of E-Musyawarah as ADR for resolving administrative disputes outside the court is legal equality.
Citas
Abdullah, Dudung. “Musyawarah dalam Al-Quran (Suatu Kajian Tafsir Tematik)”. Al Daulah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Ketatanegaraan 3, no. 2 (24 Desember 2014): 242–53. https://doi. org/10.24252/ad.v3i2.1509.
Abdurrahman, Konoras. Aspek Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Secara Mediasi di Pengadilan. Jakarta: PT. RajaGrafindo Persada, 2017.
Amarini, Indriati, Noorfajri Ismail, Yusuf Saefudin, Zeehan Fuad Attamimi, dan Astika Nurul Hidayah. “Exploring the Effectiveness of Mediation in Resolving Disputes in the Indonesian Administrative Court”. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 9, no. 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.vol9i1.4632.
AS Mariyam, Yurike Siti. E-Government Dalam Pelayanan Publik. Pasaman Barat: CV. Azka Pustaka, 2024.
Azizah, Annisa Farah. “Kepatuhan dan Ketaatan Hukum Masyarakat Lamaru terhadap Hukum di Indonesia”. De Cive: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan 2, no. 2 (2022): 61–69. https://doi.org/10.56393/decive.v2i2.1497.
Azizah, Fawaidil Ilmiah, Khrisna Hadiwinata, and Mahamadaree Waeno. “Digitalization of Alternative Dispute Resolution: Realizing Business Fair Principles In The Current Era”. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 23, no. 2 (29 Agustus 2023): 429–49. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2023.23.2.3667.
Cabral, James E., Abhijeet Chavan, Thomas M Clarke, John Greacen, Bonnie Rose Hough, Linda Rexer, Jane Ribadeneyra, and Richard Zorza. “Using Technology to Enhance Access to Justice”. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 26, no. 1 (2012): 241–324.
Carnevale, P J, and D G Pruitt. “Negotiation and Mediation”. Annual Review of Psychology. Annual Reviews, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.43.020192.002531.
Deng, Qinwen, Shuai Xiang, and Boli Chen. “Rural Land Consolidation and Social Consciousness Change: A Case Study of a Land Consolidation Program in Rural Chongqing, China”. Sustainability 15, no. 22 (2023): 15853. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152215853.
Fairman, David, Diana Chigas, Elizabeth McClintock, and Nick Drager. “Managing the Negotiation Process”. In Negotiating Public Health in a Globalized World: Global Health Diplomacy in Action. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2780-9_3.
Fleerackers, Frank. “Alternative Dispute Resolution and Affective Legal Analysis”. Revue interdisciplinaire d’études juridiques 43, no. 2 (1999): 93–134. https://doi.org/10.3917/riej.043.0093.
Friedman, L.M. The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. Russell Sage Foundation, 1975.
Ghani, Abdul, Asep Fathurohman, and Ade Jamarudin. “Komparasi Tafsir Mafatih Al-Ghaib dan Anwar Al Tanzil Wa Asrar Al Ta’wil tentang Musyawarah QS Ali Imran Ayat 159”. Reslaj: Religion Education Social Laa Roiba Journal 5, no. 6 (2023): 3043-56. https://doi.org/10.47467/reslaj.v5i6.2908.
Juwana, Hikmahanto. Dispute Resolution Process in Indonesia. Institute of Developing Economies, 2003.
Kawamura, Koichi. “Consensus and Democracy in Indonesia: Musyawarah-Mufakat Revisited”.
IDE Discussion Paper 308 (2011). https://www.ide.go.jp/English/Publish/Reports/Dp/308.html.
Kriesberg, Louis, and Joyce Neu. “Conflict Analysis and Resolution as a Field”. in The International Studies Encyclopedia. Wiley-Blackwell, 2017.
Ma, Zhenzhong, and Alfred M. Jaeger. “A Comparative Study of the Influence of Assertiveness on Negotiation Outcomes in Canada and China”. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal 17, no. 4 (2010): 333–46. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527601011086568.
Madung, Otto Gusti Ndegong, and Winibaldus Stefanus Mere. “Constructing Modern Indonesia Based on Pancasila in Dialogue with the Political Concepts Underlying the Idea of Human Rights”. Journal of Southeast Asian Human Rights 5, no. 1 (2021): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.19184/jseahr.v5i1.20258.
Mukhid. “Musyawarah Dalam Perspektif Ekonomi Islam”. Jurnal Masharif Al-Syariah: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Perbankan Syariah 1, no. 2 (2016): 15–27. https://doi.org/10.30651/jms.v1i2.760.
Munte, Hardi. Model Penyelesaian Sengketa Administrasi Pilkada. Medan: Puspantara, 2017.
Natalis, Aga, Ani Purwanti, and Teddy Asmara. “Determining Appropriate Policies for Prostitution Reform in Indonesia: Evaluating Harm Reduction Versus Harm Elimination Strategies”. Journal of Southeast Asian Human Rights 7, no. 2 (2023): 176-213. https://doi.org/10.19184/jseahr.v7i2.37952.
Riskin, Leonard L. “Understanding Mediators’ Orientations, Strategies, and Techniques: A Grid for the Perplexed”. In Mediation, 137–81. Routledge, 2018.
Romdoni, Muhamad, Mawarni Fatma, Rizki Nurdiansyah, Suyanto Suyanto, and Arief Fahmi Lubis. “A Critique and Solution of Justice, Certainty, and Usefulness in Law Enforcement in Indonesia”. Journal of Law Science 5, no. 4 (2023): 174–81. https://doi.org/10.35335/jls.v5i4.4269.
Sastrowiyono, Akhmad Al-Farouqi. “The Pro’s and Con’s of Arbitration: A Study of International Arbitration with Perspective of Indonesian and Korean Law”. Jurnal Lex Renaissance 4, no. 2 (2019): 231–47. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol4.iss2.art2.
Siboy, Ahmad, Sholahuddin Al-Fatih, Virga Dwi Efendi, and Nur Putri Hidayah. “The Effectiveness of Administrative Efforts in Reducing State Administration Disputes”. Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System 2, no. 1 (2022): 14–30. https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v2i1.23.
Simanjuntak, Enrico Parulian. “The Rise and the Fall of the Jurisdiction of Indonesia’s Administrative Courts: Impediments and Prospects”. Indonesia Law Review 10, no. 2 (2020): 159–90. https://doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v10n2.611.
Sitorus, Winner. “Online Dispute Resolution: The Conceptualization of Business Dispute Resolution Model in Indonesia”. Online Dispute Resolution 1, no. 1 (2024): 34–41.
Strazisar, Borut. “Alternative Dispute Resolution”. Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, no. 3 (2018): 214–33. https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2018.3.214.233.
Suwignyo, Agus, and Rhoma Dwi Aria Yuliantri. “An Analysis of The Discursive Gap in the Ideas and Practices of Musyawarah Mufakat in the Indonesian Nation-State Formation, 1900-1980s”. Paramita: Historical Studies Journal 33, no. 1 (2023): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.15294/paramita.v33i1.41514.
Wereh, Agustien, and Istislam Istislam. “Conflict in Management of Passive State Administrative Decision in State Administrative Dispute”. Brawijaya Law Journal 5, no. 2 (2018): 249–60. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.blj.2018.005.02.08.
Yuliana. “The Philosophy of Pancasila in the Religious Perspective in Indonesia During the Covid-19 Pandemic”. Pancasila: Jurnal Keindonesiaan 1, no. 2 (2021): 141–51. https://doi.org/10.52738/pjk.v1i2.29.
Zhomartkyzy, Maria. “The Role of Mediation in International Conflict Resolution”. Law and Safety 90, no. 3 (2023): 169–78. https://doi.org/10.32631/pb.2023.3.14.
Zoelva, Hamdan. “The Development of Islam and Democracy in Indonesia”. Constitutional Review 8, no. 1 (2022): 37–61. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev812
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Revista Brasileira de Alternative Dispute Resolution - Brazilian Journal of Alternative Dispute Resolution - RBADR
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
No royalties or other compensation shall be due for the publication of the works.
The opinions expressed by the authors of the articles and reviews are their sole responsibility.
