Novas regras de arbitragem na China continental
reformulando o cenário da resolução de disputas?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52028/rbadr.v7.i14.ART11.POLPalavras-chave:
China, Resolução de disputas, Arbitragem, Digitalização, Novas tecnologiasResumo
As instituições arbitrais chinesas utilizam ferramentas de inteligência artificial (IA). A Comissão de Arbitragem de Guangzhou (GAC) introduziu o chamado assistente de arbitragem por IA, que permite não apenas a interpretação simultânea, mas também a criação automática de transcrições nos procedimentos arbitrais. Os principais objetivos da pesquisa são: examinar as mudanças recentes nas regras de arbitragem das instituições chinesas, com foco na digitalização e na integração de ferramentas baseadas em IA; e avaliar o potencial dessas inovações para influenciar os padrões internacionais de arbitragem. Assim, a análise levanta a questão de quais soluções, desenvolvidas pelas principais instituições de arbitragem da China, poderão ser adotadas globalmente. Conclui-se que a China está determinada a adaptar sua legislação nacional, inclusive em áreas sensíveis como a arbitragem ad hoc, para se consolidar como um centro de resolução de disputas plenamente reconhecido, alinhado aos padrões internacionais.
Referências
New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. https://www.newyorkconvention.org/english. Accessed 10 July 2025.
Annual Report on International Commercial Arbitration in China (2022-2023), ed. China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission, translated by Wolters Kluwer China. http://www.cietac.org/Uploads/202310/Annual%20Report%20On%20International%20Commercial%20Arbitration%20In%20China(2022-2023)-en.pdf. Accessed 20 July 2025.
CHEN, Lei. Will Virtual Hearings Remain in Post Pandemic International Arbitration? International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, vol. 37, pp. 829-849, 2024.
China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC). Arbitration Rules (Revised and Adopted by the China Council for the Promotion of International Trade/China Chamber of International Commerce on September 2, 2023. Effective as of January 1, 2024). http://www.cietac.org/index.php?m=Page&a=index&id=531&l=en. Accessed 14 July 2025.
DONG, Arthur (Xiao). Another Remarkable Step Forward: Comments on the CIETAC Arbitration Rules 2024. Asian Dispute Review, Hong Kong, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 172–177, 2024. https://kluwerlawonline.com/journalarticle/Asian+Dispute+Review/26.4/ADR2024031.
EKEN, Can. Third-Party Funding in Investment Arbitration. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-63620-2.
EFSTATHIOU, Stephanie G. Arbitration Tech Toolbox: ChatGPT – Arbitral Assistant or Fourth Arbitrator? Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 22.07.2023. https://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2023/07/22/arbitration-tech-toolbox-chatgpt-arbitral-assistant-or-fourth-arbitrator/. Accessed 18 July 2025.
ŁĄGIEWSKA, Magdalena. Digitalization and the Use of New Technologies in International Arbitration. Leiden: Brill, 2024.
ŁĄGIEWSKA, Magdalena. New Technologies in International Arbitration: A Game-Changer in Dispute Resolution? International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, vol. 37, pp. 851-864, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-023-10070-7.
MOREIRA, João Ilhão; ZHANG, Jiawei. ChatGPT as a Fourth Arbitrator? The Ethics and Risks of Using Large Language Models in Arbitration. Arbitration International, Oxford, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 71–84, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1093/arbint/aiae031.
PIERS, Maud; McCARTHY, Sean (eds.). Transforming Arbitration: Exploring the Impact of AI, Blockchain, Metaverse and Web3. Ghent: Readout University Press, 2025. https://doi.org/10.54195/FMVV7173.
QIAO, Kang. AI and Arbitration: China’s Efforts. Clyde & Co, 08.02.2024. https://www.clydeco.com/en/insights/2024/02/ai-in-arbitration-china-s-efforts. Accessed 17 July 2025.
QIU, Quanlin. AI Arbitration Used for Dispute in Guangzhou. China Daily, 01.09.2023. https://global.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202309/01/WS64f13406a310d2dce4bb34ad.html. Accessed 17 July 2025.
Shanghai International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission (Shanghai International Arbitration Center). Arbitration Rules (2024). https://www.shiac.org/pc/SHIAC?moduleCode=arbitrate_rules&-securityId=E6vaUKiYEKhVojqg6VGPNA. Accessed 18 July 2025.
The Supreme People’s Court. The Opinions on Regulating and Strengthening the Applications of Artificial Intelligence in the Judicial Fields (2022) 最高人民法院关于规范和加强人工智能司法应用的意见. https://www.chinajusticeobserver.com/law/x/the-supreme-people-s-court-the-opinions-on-regulating-and-strengthening-the-applications-of-artificial-intelligence-in-the-judicial-field-20221208. Accessed 19 July 2025.
UNCITRAL. Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration (1985), with amendments as adopted in 2006. https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/uncitral/en/19-09955_e_ebook.pdf. Accessed 10 July 2025.
UNITED NATIONS COMMISSION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW (UNCITRAL). 2001. Model Law on Electronic Signatures with Guide to Enactment. https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/uncitral/en/ml-elecsig-e.pdf. Accessed 12 October 2025.
UNITED NATIONS COMMISSION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW (UNCITRAL). 2025. Report of Working Group II (Dispute Settlement) on the work of its eighty-first session (New York, 3–7 February 2025). Fifty-eighth session, Vienna, 7–25 July 2025, A/CN.9/1200. https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/uncitral/en/acn9-1200_advance_copy.pdf, p. 4. Accessed 10 October 2025.
WAHAB, Mohamed S. Abdel; KATSH, Ethan. Revolutionizing Technologies and the Use of Technology in International Arbitration: Innovation, Legitimacy, Prospects and Challenges. In: PIERS, Maud; ASCHAUER, Christian (eds.). Arbitration in the Digital Age: The Brave New World of Arbitration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018, pp. 27–55.
WOLFF, Reinmar. E-Arbitration Agreements and E-Awards: Arbitration Agreements Concluded in an Electronic Environment and Digital Arbitral Awards. In: PIERS, Maud; ASCHAUER, Christian (eds.). Arbitration in the Digital Age: The Brave New World of Arbitration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018, pp. 151–181.
VOLIO SOLEY, Fernando. Signing the Arbitral Award in Wet Ink: Resistance to Technological Change or a Reasonable Precaution? Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 06.11.2020. https://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2020/11/06/signing-the-arbitral-award-in-wet-ink-resistance-to-technological-change-or-a-reasonable-precaution/. Accessed 15 July 2025.
YAO, Yi, QU, Zhujun, ZHAO, Jian. The CIETAC Arbitration Rules 2024 Comes Into Force. Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 01.01.2024. https://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2024/01/01/the-cietac-arbitration-rules-2024-comes-into-force/. Accessed 15 July 2025.
ZENG, Yanfei. Developments in the CIETAC 2024 Rules. Global Arbitration News, 20.02.2024. https://www.globalarbitrationnews.com/2024/02/20/developments-in-the-cietac-2024-rules/. Accessed 16 July 2025.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Não serão devidos direitos autorais ou qualquer outra remuneração pela publicação dos trabalhos.
As opiniões emitidas pelos autores dos artigos e resenhas são de sua exclusiva responsabilidade.
