Labour disputes in international practice
Examples from Poland, Germany, and the USA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52028/rbadr.v7.i13.ART12.KUNPalavras-chave:
Reformas legislativas, Mediação, Arbitragem, Negociação coletiva, Direitos dos trabalhadores, SindicatosResumo
Este estudo tem como objetivo identificar práticas eficazes de resolução de disputas trabalhistas em outros países que possam ser adaptadas para aprimorar o sistema jurídico do Cazaquistão. A pesquisa utiliza o método jurídico formal para examinar a regulamentação legal da resolução de conflitos trabalhistas, o método estatístico para coleta e análise de dados, e o método comparativo para confrontar a experiência internacional com a prática cazaque. Como resultado, são analisados e destacados os principais problemas na área da resolução de disputas laborais, incluindo dificuldades relacionadas à acessibilidade e à eficácia dos procedimentos judiciais, bem como o uso insuficiente de métodos alternativos de resolução de conflitos, como a mediação e a arbitragem. Além disso, os principais achados do estudo mostram que Polônia, Alemanha e Estados Unidos apresentam abordagens distintas, porém eficazes, na resolução de disputas trabalhistas. Na Polônia, a mediação e a arbitragem são amplamente utilizadas, o que ajuda a reduzir a carga dos tribunais e a resolver conflitos de forma célere. A Alemanha se destaca por seu sistema de tribunais do trabalho, especializados exclusivamente em disputas laborais e altamente eficientes em sua resolução. Nos Estados Unidos, o National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) desempenha um papel fundamental, monitorando de forma eficaz o cumprimento das leis trabalhistas e solucionando disputas por meio de procedimentos administrativos. Com base na experiência internacional, o estudo formula recomendações para aprimorar a prática jurídica no Cazaquistão, incluindo a introdução e o fortalecimento da mediação, a criação de estruturas judiciais especializadas e o reforço do arcabouço institucional para uma gestão e resolução eficazes dos conflitos trabalhistas.
Referências
ABDRASULOV, Yermek Bayakhmetovich; SHALABAEV, S.R.; MUGAUOVA, Ajnur I. Interpretation of the constitution and of law-transforming principles within activity of courts and the agency of constitutional control in the republic of Kazakhstan. European Research Studies Journal, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 93-102, 2015.
ACT OF LABOUR CODE. 1974. Retrieved from https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU19740240141/U/D19740141Lj.pdf
ALABDALI, Mahmoud A.; BASAHAL, Abdulrahman S. Strategies for mitigating labour disputes in the private sector: Insights from Saudi HR and legal experts. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-024-09506-4
APAKHAYEV, Nurlan; MADIYAROVA, Ainur S.; AIGARINOVA, Gulnar; RYSKALIYEV, Dauletbai U.; BURIBAYEV, Yermek A.; KHAMZINA, Zhanna A. Current trends of legal regulation of relationships in the social protection sphere. Man in India, vol. 97, no. 11, pp. 221-231, 2017.
ARTUS, Ingrid; HOLLAND, Judith. Trade unions, collective bargaining and gender in Germany. In ELOMÄKI, A.; KANTOLA, J.; KOSKINEN SANDBERG, P. (Eds.), Social Partners and Gender Equality: Change and Continuity in Gendered Corporatism in Europe. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 223-244, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81178-5_10
BAI, Yu; LI, Yanjun; UMER, Hamza. Corruption disclosure and its impact on labour-related actions. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4737238
BERGER, Helge; NEUGART, Michael. How German labour courts decide: An econometric case study. German Economic Review, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 56-70, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0475.2011.00539.x
BOSETTI, Luisa. Occupational safety and health administration. In IDOWU, S., SCHMIDPETER, R., CAPALDI, N., ZU, L., DEL BALDO, M., ABREU, R. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Sustainable Management. Cham: Springer, p. 1-7, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02006-4_922-1
BOŽOVIĆ, Bojan V. North and south of European labour and social judiciary. Proceedings of the Faculty of Law, Novi Sad, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 2025-2045, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfns49-9356
CALO, Zachary R. Labour rights and dispute system design: Assessing the legal legacy of the 2022 Qatar World Cup. German Law Journal, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 1729-1739, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2023.122
CICHOBŁAZIŃSKI, Leszek. Resolving collective disputes in Poland: A narrative perspective. In MÜLLER, A.P.; BECKER, L. (Eds.), Narrative and Innovation: New Ideas for Business Administration, Strategic Management and Entrepreneurship. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, pp. 119-129, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-01375-2_7
COKER, Julie Olajumoke; IJIGA, Amina Catherine; UZOUGBO, Ngozi Samuel; OKOLIE, Chwukwuma Albert; OGUEJIOFOR, Bisola Beatrice; AKAGHA, Onyinyechi Vivian. Exploring alternative dispute resolution mechanisms in resolving commercial and labour disputes: Comparative analysis of Nigeria and the United States. Socio Economy and Policy Studies, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 119-123, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26480/seps.02.2023.119.123
CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN. 1995. Retrieved from https://www.akorda.kz/kz/official_documents/constitution
DAUTBAYEVA-MUKHTAROVA, Erkairatkyzy; ASKAROVA, Aliya Otarbayevna; SULEYMENOVA, Saule Zhusupbekovna. Civil law regulation of the right to life and right to health in the field of chemical safety of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Middle East Journal of Scientific Research, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 502-507, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2013.14.4.2121
DISMISSAL PROTECTION ACT. 1969. Retrieved from https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/kschg/BJNR004990951.html
GAMONAL, Sergio C.; ROSADO MARZÁN, César F. Principled labour law: U.S. labour law through a Latin American method. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190052669.001.0001
GERA, Anton. The right to work in international and national law in the time of globalization. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research and Development, vol. 11, no. 1, Art. no. S1, pp. 123-130, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56345/ijrdv11n1s119
GODLEWSKA-BUJOK, Barbara; WALCZAK, Krzysztof. Does care matter – The principles of the Polish labour law versus care practices. Italian Labour Law E-Journal, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 95-107, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1561-8048/16676
GUTOWSKI, Maciej. Direct application of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland in judicial practice. Legal Studies, vol. 2, no. 226, pp. 75-105, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37232/sp.2022i
HAFIZ, Hiba. Structural labour rights. Michigan Law Review, vol. 119, no. 4, pp. 651-728, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36644/mlr.119.4.structural
HAN, Nguyen Mai; CHAU, Mac Giang; DUY, Nguyen Bao. Perfecting the mechanism of successful mediation agreement under the laws of Vietnam and the experience of Germany, USA, Australia, and Singapore. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, vol. 11, no. 10, Art. no. e1760, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i10.1760
HARTLEY, Roger C. Fulfilling the pledge: Securing industrial democracy for American workers in a digital economy. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/15128.001.0001
HU, Jieren; MARTIN, Daniel. Labour dispute resolution and migrant workers’ legal rights protection in China. Chinese Journal of International Review, vol. 2, no. 1, Art. no. 2050004, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S2630531320500043
JABLONSKIS, Alvydas; PETERSONE, Mara; KETNERS, Karlis. Insights into the definition of customs logistics. Intellectual Economics, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 16-33, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13165/IE-18-12-1-02
KHAMZINA, Zhanna; BURIBAYEV, Yermek; ALMAGANBETOV, Pernebay; TAZHMAGAMBET, Amantay; SAMALDYKOVA, Zaure; APAKHAYEV, Nurlan. Labor disputes in Kazakhstan: Results of legal regulation and future prospects. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1-14, 2020.
KLOTS, Alissa. Just like any other worker? Class, gender, and labour rights. In Domestic Service in the Soviet Union: Women’s Emancipation and the Gendered Hierarchy of Labour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 64-91, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009467193.006
KOBROŃ-GĄSIOROWSKA, Łucja. 2022. Economically dependent standard as a criterion of employment rights for semi-employed workers in Poland. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridica, 101, 119-131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6069.101.09
KUMENOV, Akmaz. 2023. Kazakhstan: Oil workers persist with strike despite firings. Retrieved from https://eurasianet.org/kazakhstan-oil-workers-persist-with-strike-despite-firings
LABOUR CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN. 2015. Retrieved from https://adilet.zan.kz/eng/docs/K1500000414
LAW OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN NO. 211-V “ON PROFESSIONAL UNIONS”. 2014. Retrieved from https://adilet.zan.kz/eng/docs/Z1400000211
LAW OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN NO. 314-V “ON MINIMUM SOCIAL STANDARDS AND THEIR GUARANTEES”. 2015. Retrieved from https://adilet.zan.kz/eng/docs/Z1500000314
LIU, Jia; YANG, Ying; XIAO, Bao-Yao; HUANG, Zhi-Tao; NIE, Xiao-Hui; LIU, Wen-Jie; CHANG, Shih-Feng. Taking AI neural network to analyze labour rights and labour disputes. E3S Web of Conferences, vol. 290, Art. no. 02028, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202129002028
MARWALA, Tshilidzi; MPEDI, Letlhokwa George. Labour law. In Artificial Intelligence and the Law. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 189-214, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-2827-5_10
NATIONAL LABOUR RELATIONS BOARD (NLRB). 1935. National Labour Relations Act. Retrieved from https://www.nlrb.gov/guidance/key-reference-materials/national-labour-relations-act
NURHAYATI, Siti; RAFIANTI, Fitri; WAKHYUNI, Emi; HUTABARAT, Willyam Lorencius. Advocacy model for combined process (med-arbitration) – Based resolution of industrial relations conflicts between trade unions and businesses. PENA JUSTISIA: Communication Media and Legal Studies, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 250-267, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v23i1.4146
OĞLU XAMMƏDOV, Elxan Əlitahir. Procedure for out-of-court resolution of individual labour disputes. Scientific Work, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 280-284, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36719/2663-4619/65/280-284
QUANG, Nguyen Nang. 2023. Resolution of individual labour disputes by court method – Theory and practice. International Journal of Learning and Development, 13(4) 72-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/ijld.v13i4.21571
RYSKALIYEV, Dauletbai U.; ZHAPAKOV, Sabyrzhan M.; APAKHAYEV, Nurlan; MOLDAKHMETOVA, Zhanar; BURIBAYEV, Yermek A.; KHAMZINA, Zhanna A. Issues of gender equality in the workplace: The case study of Kazakhstan. Space and Culture, India, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 15-26, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20896/saci.v7i2.450
SHARMA, Malvika; YADAV, Manish Kumar. Arbitration: The revolution in resolving dispute. In JOSHI, N. (Ed.), Mediation: A New Path for Dispute Resolution. New Delhi: Integrity Education, pp. 89-102, 2024. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378831234_Arbitration_The_Revolution_in_Resolving_Dispute
SPYTSKA, Liana. Analysis of the most unusual court decisions in the world practice in terms of the right to justice. Social and Legal Studios, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 39-45, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32518/2617-4162-2022-5-4-39-45
SUDIARAWAN, Kadek Agus; MARTANA, Putu Ade Hariestha; MARTANA, Nyoman A.; HERMANTO, Bagus. Position of collective labour agreement as a company autonomous law: Industrial relation dispute settlement approach. Udayana Master Law Journal, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 457-470, 2019. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343162057_Position_of_Collective_Labour_Agreement_as_a_Company_Autonomous_Law_Industrial_Relation_Dispute_Settlement_Approach
SUPREME COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN. Bulletin of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan, vol. 7, no. 2023, 2023. Retrieved from https://sud.gov.kz/sites/default/files/pagefiles/byulleten_no_7_2023_g.pdf
SZYMANSKI, Charles F. The idea of the “general clause” in American labour law. Bialystok Legal Studies, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 11-49, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15290/bsp.2021.26.02.01
TANGSATAPORNPAN, Benjawan. The future of work and labour dispute settlement. Thai Legal Studies, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 90-116, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54157/tls.257801
TASYBAYEVA, Saule K. Current issues of resolving individual labour disputes. Journal of Actual Problems of Jurisprudence, vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 80-86, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26577/JAPJ.2022.v102.i2.08
VIDOJEVIĆ, Boban. Arbitration for individual labour disputes. Messenger of Law, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 17-29, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46793/GP.1101.17V
WANJIRU, Mary. The role of international trade agreements in shaping labour standards and worker rights. International Journal of Law and Policy, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 38-48, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47604/ijlp.2646
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Não serão devidos direitos autorais ou qualquer outra remuneração pela publicação dos trabalhos.
As opiniões emitidas pelos autores dos artigos e resenhas são de sua exclusiva responsabilidade.