Causas de litígios de Direito Civil entre sujeitos de atividade empresarial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52028/rbadr.v7.i14.ART10.KAZPalavras-chave:
Arcabouço jurídico, Arbitragem, Mediação, Execução contractual, InovaçãoResumo
Este estudo examina as causas dos litígios de direito civil entre entidades empresariais no Cazaquistão, comparando-as com disputas semelhantes nos Estados Unidos, no Reino Unido e na China. Utilizando uma abordagem analítica comparativa, a pesquisa analisa dados estatísticos provenientes de fontes jurídicas oficiais e de sites especializados, abrangendo o período de 2015 a 2022. A análise identifica como principais fatores geradores de litígios as violações de cláusulas contratuais relativas a pagamento e entrega, conflitos de propriedade e práticas comerciais fraudulentas. Apesar das diferenças entre os contextos nacionais, o estudo constata que a maioria das disputas decorre de falhas de entendimento sobre arranjos financeiros, gestão contratual e autoridade decisória. O artigo também avalia a eficácia do arcabouço jurídico cazaque, destacando a limitada implementação prática de mecanismos de resolução alternativa de disputas, como mediação e arbitragem. Os resultados contribuem para o debate sobre o aperfeiçoamento dos processos de resolução de conflitos, propondo reformas que visam alinhar o sistema jurídico do Cazaquistão às melhores práticas internacionais, de modo a apoiar a atividade empreendedora e reduzir a sobrecarga do Judiciário.
Referências
AKHMETZHAROV, Slyamzhar, ORAZGALIYEV, Serik. Labor unions and institutional corruption: The case of Kazakhstan. Journal of Eurasian Studies, vol. 12, n. 2, pp. 133-144, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1177/18793665211041198.
AKIMBEKOVA, Meruyert, TALAPOVA, Gulmira, KUDAIBERGENOV, Zakir, & SULEIMENOV, Maidan. The concept and features of the settlement of investment disputes under the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University. Series “Physics”, vol. 56, pp. 722-729, 2024. https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/56.2024.72ikl2.
AKSOY, Pınar Çağlayan. The applicability of property law rules for crypto assets: Considerations from civil law and common law perspectives. Law, Innovation and Technology, vol. 15, n. 1, pp. 185-221, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2023.2184140.
ANDERLINI, Luca, FELLI, Leonardo, RIBONI, Alessandro. Legal efficiency and consistency. European Economic Review, vol. 121, p. 103323, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2019.103323.
APAKHAYEV, Nurlan, ADILOVA, Kultay, BUGYBAY, Dina, MUKALDYEVA, Gulyiya, MUKHAMADIYEVA, Gulzhan, KOSHPENBETOV, Bakhytkali. Childhood legal protection in Kazakhstan. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, vol. 8, n. 3, pp. 714-721, 2017. https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/1439.
BEKISHEV, Askhat, IBRAYEVA, Alua, SMANOVA, Akmaral, NUSSIPOVA, Lyatifa, KAN, Aleksandr. Challenges in contract murder investigations. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, vol. 10, n. 3, pp. 725-733, 2019. https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/4655.
BEKTUROVA, Aidana, SHARIPOV, Shaimardan, AKHATOV, Ualikhan, MADALIYEVA, Akzada, TURSYNKULOVA, Dinara. Problems of harmonization of legislation of Kazakhstan and China in the conditions of the WTO. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, vol. 20, n. 2, pp. 1-6, 2017.
BENELFAKIH, Elarafi. The types of formality in legal transactions. Law Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, vol. 14, n. 4, pp. 32-40, 2024. https://doi.org/10.56215/naia-chasopis/4.2024.32.
BICHIA, Mikheil. Advantages of mediation in civil disputes. Law and World, vol. 9, n. 27, pp. 63-104, 2023. https://doi.org/10.36475/9.3.6.
BOURKE, Jane, ROPER, Stephen, LOVE, James H. Innovation in legal services: The practices that influence ideation and codification activities. Journal of Business Research, vol. 109, pp. 132-147, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.057.
BURIBAYEV, Yermek, KHAMZINA, Zhanna. Resolving individual labor disputes in Kazakhstan in the era of human rights. Journal of Actual Problems of Jurisprudence, vol. 99, n. 3, pp. 28-36, 2021. https://doi.org/10.26577/JAPJ.2021.v99.i3.03.
Civil Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 1994. Available at: https://adilet.zan.kz/eng/docs/K940001000.
Civil Procedural Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 2015. Available at: https://adilet.zan.kz/eng/docs/K1500000377.
Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 401-IV “On Mediation”. (2011, January). Available at: https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=30927376&pos=147;-41#pos=147;-41.
LIU, Xiaohong. On modernization of the diversified resolution mechanism for civil and commercial disputes in China. Frontiers of Law in China, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 98 -116, 2024.
MAKHAMBETSALIYEV, Dauren, ALIMOVA, Elvira, UTEGENOV, Chingiz, SAGYNBEKOVA, Gulnar, SMANOVA, Akmaral. The main directions of the judicial activity of the Supreme Court of the United States in the field of civil rights and freedoms. Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University. Series Physics, vol. 55, pp. 1532-1542, 2024. https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/55.2024.153ol2.
MARTÍN, Pinchi Bartra, VELAZCO LÉVANO, Nilton César, & DANIEL, Coral Pérez Victor. Inheritance disputes due to errors and omissions in the civil registry: legal implications of the lack of documented identity and family ties. Journal of Ecohumanism, vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 7108-7114, 2024.
MCINTYRE, Joe, OLIJNYK, Anna, PENDER, Kieran. Civil courts and COVID-19: Challenges and opportunities in Australia. Alternative Law Journal, vol. 45, n. 3, pp. 195-201, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969X20956787.
MENOVA, Ardak Shai, ILYASSOVA, Gulzhazira, KLYUYEVA, Yevgeniya, & KHASHIMOVA, Ainura. Development of the Institution of Arbitration in Kazakhstan: Problems of Theory and Practice. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, vol. 11, n. 2 (48), pp. 557-573, 2020.
MONATERI, Pier G. Understanding the civil law, 2015. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2548417.
MUKALDYEVA, Guliya B., URISBAEVA, Aynur A., ALKEBAEVA, Zhanatu A. Legal features of competition obligations according to the civil legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Journal of Actual Problems of Jurisprudence, vol. 97, n. 1, pp. 24-37, 2021. https://doi.org/10.26577/JAPJ.2021.v97.i1.03.
MUSAKHONOVICH, Mamasiddikov Muzaffarkhon, ESIRGAPOVICH, Esanov Azamat, JAELANI, Abdul Kadir, KHAIRULDIN, Wan Mohd Khairul Firdaus, & LUTHVIATI, Resti Dian. The protection of labor rights on the court system. Journal of Human Rights Culture and Legal System, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 742–764, 2024.
OMIRZHANOV, Yesbol, BIRZHANKYZY, Alpysbek M. Features of civil society formation in Kazakhstan: Problems and prospects. International Journal of Current Research, vol. 8, n. 3, pp. 28723-28728, 2016.
PETROVSKYI, Andrii, KYRDAN, Bohdan, KUTSYK, Kateryna. Implementation of artificial intelligence in civil proceedings: Experience of EU countries. Scientific Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, vol. 30, n. 1, pp. 45-59, 2025. https://doi.org/10.63341/naia-herald/1.2025.45.
RAKIMULI, Aitoldi, TALAPOVA, Gulmira, & AKIMBEKOVA, Saida. Comparative analysis of mediation in the legislation of Kazakhstan and the People’s Republic of China. Social and Legal Studios, vol. 7, n. 3, pp. 127-136, 2024. https://doi.org/10.32518/sals3.2024.127.
SAPARBEKOVA, Elvira, SMANOVA, Akmaral, MAKHAMBETSALIYEV, Dauren, NESSIPBAEVA, Indira, NUSSIPOVA, Latifa. Comparative Analysis of the Concept of Constitutional Judicial Law-Making in the United States of America and Kazakhstan. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, vol. 38, n. 2, pp. 603-617, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-024-10138-y.
SARTAEV, Spatay A., KALSHABAYEVA, Manzhuk Zh., OTYNSHIYEVA, Aidana A. Problems of increasing the legal awareness of Kazakhstan society. Journal of Actual Problems of Jurisprudence, vol. 91, n. 3, pp. 4-10, 2019. https://doi.org/10.26577/JAPJ.2019.v91.i3.01
SCHÄFER, Hans-Bernd. Civil law as a common heritage, challenges for law and economics and for comparative law, 2024. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4709299.
SIBARANI, William Edward, PUSPANINGSIH, Utami, & STEFANIE, Clarita. Quasi-Contract: A comparative analysis between the United States of America and Indonesia. PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 11(2), 274–293, 2024.
SOPELNYK, Ihor. The essence of human rights and the transformation of their protection mechanisms. Law. Human. Environment, vol. 16, n. 1, pp. 122-146, 2025. https://doi.org/10.31548/law/1.2025.122.
SOURDIN, Tania, LI, Bin, MCNAMARA, Donna M. Court innovations and access to justice in times of crisis. Health Policy and Technology, vol. 9, n. 4, pp. 447-453, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.08.020.
SPYTSKA, Liana. Analysis of the most unusual court decisions in the world practice in terms of the right to justice. Social and Legal Studios, vol. 5, n. 4, pp. 39-45, 2022.
TAN, Veltrice. The Belt and Road Initiative: conflict of laws and dispute resolution. Journal of Financial Crime, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 1420-1435, 2024.
THORNBURG, Elizabeth, CAMERON, Camille. Defining civil disputes: Lessons from two jurisdictions. Melbourne University Law Review, vol. 35, n. 1, pp. 208-235, 2011.
TOBIA, Kevin. Experimental jurisprudence. University of Chicago Law Review, vol. 89, n. 3, pp. 735-802, 2022.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Não serão devidos direitos autorais ou qualquer outra remuneração pela publicação dos trabalhos.
As opiniões emitidas pelos autores dos artigos e resenhas são de sua exclusiva responsabilidade.
