Quantum arbitration
uncovering the unobvious in the development of arbitration and law of the future
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52028/rbadr.v7.i14.ART07.RUSchlagworte:
Quantum Technologies, Quantum arbitration, Alternative dispute resolution, Civil procedure, Quantum signature, Quantum optimization algorithmAbstract
The article focuses on the challenges and future possibilities of quantum arbitration, which is envisioned as the arbitration of the future. The legal scientific community is currently engaged in extensive discussions about quantum technologies, as it has been demonstrated that the properties of quantum phenomena can significantly influence various areas of law, particularly in dispute resolution. This article explores the potential of incorporating quantum technologies into arbitration, highlighting how they can enhance effectiveness in specific aspects of the arbitration process, including case management, execution of arbitration agreements, and predictive arbitration analytics. Additionally, the article seeks to deepen the doctrinal understanding of the prospects and legal implications of employing quantum technologies in arbitration. To accomplish this, the authors utilized a variety of methods, including legal forecasting and comparative legal analysis. The authors conclude that it is essential to adapt and modernize existing regulations and propose a multilevel regulatory framework for quantum arbitration.
Literaturhinweise
ALETRAS, N. Predicting judicial decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: a natural language processing perspective. PeerJ Computer Science, v. 2, e93, 2016.
ATIK, J.; JEUTNER, V. Quantum computing and computational law. Law, Innovation and Technology, v. 13, n. 3, p. 1–23, 2021. DOI: 10.1080/17579961.2021.1977216.
ATIK, J. Quantum computing and the legal imagination. SciTech Lawyer, v. 22, p. 1–5, 2022.
BALARABE, K. Quantum computing and the law: navigating the legal implications of a quantum leap. European Journal of Risk Regulation, n. 2, p. 1–20, 2025. DOI: 10.1017/err.2025.8.
BLOOMBERG LAW. Comparative Analytics Tool. Available at: https://pro.bloomberglaw.com/legal-analytics/. Accessed: 13 July 2025.
DAVENPORT, Th. H.; KIM, J. Keeping up with the quants: your guide to understanding and using analytics. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press, 2013.
DE ARAUJO, N.; DE FREITAS, C. G. O caso Enka Insaat v. Insurance Company Chubb e a questão relativa à lei aplicável à cláusula arbitral: entre a lex contractus e a Lei da Sede. Revista Brasileira de Alternative Dispute Resolution, v. 3, n. 5, p. 159–194, 2021.
DOBROBABA, M. B.; CHANNOV, S. E.; MINBALEEV, A. V. Quantum communications: prospects for legal regulation. Bulletin of the O.E. Kutafin University (MGUA), n. 4 (92), p. 25, 2022.
EFFODUH, J. O. Quantum justice: how could quantum computing transform the legal system? Disponível em: https://www.weforum.org/stories/2025/05/quantum-justice-could-quantum-computing-transform-the-legal-system/. Acesso em: 13 jul. 2025.
FALCONER, C. International Handbook on Commercial Arbitration – Supplement 132: Sweden Note. 2024.
FERREIRA, D.; GIOVANNINI, C.; GROMOVA, E.; DA ROCHA SCHMIDT, G. Arbitration chambers and trust in technology provider: impacts of trust in technology intermediated dispute resolution proceedings. Technology in Society, v. 2, n. 68, p. 101872, 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101872.
FERREIRA, D. B.; GIOVANNINI, C.; GROMOVA, E. A.; FERREIRA, J. B. Arbitration chambers and technology: witness tampering and perceived effectiveness in videoconferenced dispute resolution proceedings. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, v. 31, n. 1, p. 75-90, Spring 2023. DOI: 10.1093/ijlit/eaad012.
FERREIRA, D. B.; GROMOVA, E. A. Hyperrealistic jurisprudence: the digital age and the (un)certainty of judge analytics. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, v. 36, p. 2261–2270, 2023. DOI: 10.1007/s11196-023-10015-0.
FERREIRA, D. B.; GROMOVA, E. A.; TITOVA, E. V. The principle of a trial within a reasonable time and JustTech: benefits and risks. Human Rights Review, 2024. DOI: 10.1007/s12142-024-00715-w.
FLORIDI, L. Translating principles into practices of digital ethics: five risks of being unethical. Philosophy and Technology, v. 32, p. 185–190, 2019.
GROMOVA, E. A.; PETRENKO, S. A. Quantum law: the beginning. Journal of Digital Technologies and Law, v. 1, n. 1, p. 62–88, 2023. DOI: 10.21202/jdtl.2023.3.
GROMOVA, E. A. Smart contracts in Russia: an attempt to determine the legal essence. Law and the Digital Economy, n. 3, p. 19–23, 2018.
ГРОМОВА, Е. А.; ФЕРРЕЙРА, Д. Б.; БЕГИШЕВ, И. Р. Искусственный интеллект, JustTech и процессуальное право. Вестник гражданского процесса, т. 14, N. 2, с. 177, 2024.
GROMOVA, E. A.; FERREIRA, D. B.; BEGISHEV, I. R. Artificial intelligence, JustTech and procedural law. Bulletin of the Civil Procedure, v. 14, n. 2, p. 177–196, 2024. DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2024-14-2-177-196.
INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION. Guidance on the interpretation of the 1958 New York Convention. Available at: https://cdn.arbitration-icca.org/s3fs-public/document/media_document/russian_text.pdf. Accessed: 13 July 2025.
LEXISNEXIS. Context Judge Analytics. Available at: https://www.lexisnexis.ca/pdf/2021/Context-Getting-Started-EN.pdf. Accessed: 13 July 2025.
MASON, S.; REINIGER, T. S. Trust between machines? Establishing identity between humans and software code, or whether you know it is a dog, and if so, which dog? Computer and Telecommunications Law Review, v. 21, p. 135–143, 2015.
MCGILL, J.; SALYZYN, A. Judging by numbers: how will judicial analytics impact the justice system and its stakeholders? Dalhousie Law Journal, v. 44, n. 1, p. 3–10, 2021.
MINBALEEV, A. V.; EFREMOV, A. A.; DOBROBABA, M. B.; CHUBUKOVA, S. G. Methods and approaches to regulating the emerging industry of quantum communications in the context of the modern information society. Information Society, n. 4, p. 112, 2024.
MEDVEDEVA, M.; WIELING, M.; VOLS, M. Rethinking the field of automatic prediction of court decisions. Artificial Intelligence and Law, v. 31, p. 195–201, 2022.
ORTOLANI, P. The impact of blockchain technologies and smart contracts on dispute resolution: arbitration and court litigation at the crossroads. Uniform Law Review, v. 24, p. 430–446, 2019. DOI: 10.1093/ulr/unz017.
PREDICTICE. Available at: https://predictice.com/fr. Accessed: 13 July 2025.
PREMONITION ANALYTICS. About us. Available at: https://premonition.ai/about-us.
RUSSIA. Federal Law No. 63-FZ “On Electronic Signatures” dated April 6, 2011. Available at: https://base.garant.ru/512184522/. Accessed: 13 July 2025.
SHEHATA, I. Smart contracts & international arbitration. 24 nov. 2018. Disponível em: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3290026. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3290026.
SLATE. France kicks data scientists out of its courts. Available at: https://slate.com/technology/2019/06/france-has-banned-judicial-analytics-to-analyze-the-courts.html. Accessed: 13 July 2025.
SOURDIN, A.; BIN LI MCNAMARA, D. M. Court innovations and access to justice in times of crisis. Health Policy and Technology, v. 9, n. 4, p. 447–451, 2020.
TCC JURIMETRIA. Available at: https://giters.com/jurimetry?ysclid=ldk8dp9c3j655957234. Accessed: 13 July 2025.
THOMSON REUTERS. Evaluate your judge – Litigation Analytics. Available at: https://legal.thomsonreuters.com/en/products/westlaw-edge/litigation-analytics. Accessed: 13 July 2025.
UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME. Assessment Study on Delayed Justice Delivery: Final Report. Available at: https://www.icj.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Final-Report-UNDP-Justice-delays-17072010.pdf. Accessed: 13 July 2025.
UNITED NATIONS. United Nations Convention on the Use of Electronic Communications in International Contracts of 2005. Available at: https://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/conventions/elect_com.shtml?ysclid=md5jlbvv4r439359310. Accessed: 13 July 2025.
UNITED STATES. Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act. Available at: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-106publ229/html/PLAW-106publ229.htm. Accessed: 13 July 2025.
UNITED STATES. Electronic Transactions Act – Uniform Law Commission. Available at: https://www.uniformlaws.org. Accessed: 13 July 2025.
XU, Z. The advance of digital signature with quantum computing. Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology, n. 39, p. 1111–1121, 2023. DOI: 10.54097/hset.v39i.6716.
Downloads
Veröffentlicht
Ausgabe
Rubrik
Lizenz
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista Brasileira de Alternative Dispute Resolution - Brazilian Journal of Alternative Dispute Resolution - RBADR
Dieses Werk steht unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International.
No royalties or other compensation shall be due for the publication of the works.
The opinions expressed by the authors of the articles and reviews are their sole responsibility.
