Quantum arbitration
uncovering the unobvious in the development of arbitration and law of the future
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52028/rbadr.v7.i14.ART07.RUPalavras-chave:
Tecnologias quânticas, Arbitragem quântica, Resolução alternativa de disputas, Processo civil, Assinatura quântica, Algoritmo de otimização quânticaResumo
O artigo aborda os desafios e as possibilidades futuras da arbitragem quântica, concebida como a arbitragem do futuro. A comunidade científica jurídica está atualmente envolvida em amplas discussões sobre tecnologias quânticas, uma vez que já foi demonstrado que as propriedades dos fenômenos quânticos podem influenciar de forma significativa diversas áreas do direito, especialmente a resolução de disputas. Este artigo explora o potencial de incorporação das tecnologias quânticas na arbitragem, destacando como elas podem aumentar a eficácia em aspectos específicos do procedimento arbitral, incluindo a gestão de casos, a execução de convenções de arbitragem e a análise preditiva arbitral. Além disso, o artigo busca aprofundar a compreensão doutrinária sobre as perspectivas e as implicações jurídicas do uso de tecnologias quânticas na arbitragem. Para alcançar esse objetivo, os autores utilizaram diversos métodos, incluindo a previsão jurídica e a análise jurídica comparada. Os autores concluem que é essencial adaptar e modernizar os regulamentos existentes, propondo um marco regulatório multinível para a arbitragem quântica.
Referências
ALETRAS, N. Predicting judicial decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: a natural language processing perspective. PeerJ Computer Science, v. 2, e93, 2016.
ATIK, J.; JEUTNER, V. Quantum computing and computational law. Law, Innovation and Technology, v. 13, n. 3, p. 1–23, 2021. DOI: 10.1080/17579961.2021.1977216.
ATIK, J. Quantum computing and the legal imagination. SciTech Lawyer, v. 22, p. 1–5, 2022.
BALARABE, K. Quantum computing and the law: navigating the legal implications of a quantum leap. European Journal of Risk Regulation, n. 2, p. 1–20, 2025. DOI: 10.1017/err.2025.8.
BLOOMBERG LAW. Comparative Analytics Tool. Available at: https://pro.bloomberglaw.com/legal-analytics/. Accessed: 13 July 2025.
DAVENPORT, Th. H.; KIM, J. Keeping up with the quants: your guide to understanding and using analytics. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press, 2013.
DE ARAUJO, N.; DE FREITAS, C. G. O caso Enka Insaat v. Insurance Company Chubb e a questão relativa à lei aplicável à cláusula arbitral: entre a lex contractus e a Lei da Sede. Revista Brasileira de Alternative Dispute Resolution, v. 3, n. 5, p. 159–194, 2021.
DOBROBABA, M. B.; CHANNOV, S. E.; MINBALEEV, A. V. Quantum communications: prospects for legal regulation. Bulletin of the O.E. Kutafin University (MGUA), n. 4 (92), p. 25, 2022.
EFFODUH, J. O. Quantum justice: how could quantum computing transform the legal system? Disponível em: https://www.weforum.org/stories/2025/05/quantum-justice-could-quantum-computing-transform-the-legal-system/. Acesso em: 13 jul. 2025.
FALCONER, C. International Handbook on Commercial Arbitration – Supplement 132: Sweden Note. 2024.
FERREIRA, D.; GIOVANNINI, C.; GROMOVA, E.; DA ROCHA SCHMIDT, G. Arbitration chambers and trust in technology provider: impacts of trust in technology intermediated dispute resolution proceedings. Technology in Society, v. 2, n. 68, p. 101872, 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101872.
FERREIRA, D. B.; GIOVANNINI, C.; GROMOVA, E. A.; FERREIRA, J. B. Arbitration chambers and technology: witness tampering and perceived effectiveness in videoconferenced dispute resolution proceedings. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, v. 31, n. 1, p. 75-90, Spring 2023. DOI: 10.1093/ijlit/eaad012.
FERREIRA, D. B.; GROMOVA, E. A. Hyperrealistic jurisprudence: the digital age and the (un)certainty of judge analytics. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, v. 36, p. 2261–2270, 2023. DOI: 10.1007/s11196-023-10015-0.
FERREIRA, D. B.; GROMOVA, E. A.; TITOVA, E. V. The principle of a trial within a reasonable time and JustTech: benefits and risks. Human Rights Review, 2024. DOI: 10.1007/s12142-024-00715-w.
FLORIDI, L. Translating principles into practices of digital ethics: five risks of being unethical. Philosophy and Technology, v. 32, p. 185–190, 2019.
GROMOVA, E. A.; PETRENKO, S. A. Quantum law: the beginning. Journal of Digital Technologies and Law, v. 1, n. 1, p. 62–88, 2023. DOI: 10.21202/jdtl.2023.3.
GROMOVA, E. A. Smart contracts in Russia: an attempt to determine the legal essence. Law and the Digital Economy, n. 3, p. 19–23, 2018.
ГРОМОВА, Е. А.; ФЕРРЕЙРА, Д. Б.; БЕГИШЕВ, И. Р. Искусственный интеллект, JustTech и процессуальное право. Вестник гражданского процесса, т. 14, N. 2, с. 177, 2024.
GROMOVA, E. A.; FERREIRA, D. B.; BEGISHEV, I. R. Artificial intelligence, JustTech and procedural law. Bulletin of the Civil Procedure, v. 14, n. 2, p. 177–196, 2024. DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2024-14-2-177-196.
INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION. Guidance on the interpretation of the 1958 New York Convention. Available at: https://cdn.arbitration-icca.org/s3fs-public/document/media_document/russian_text.pdf. Accessed: 13 July 2025.
LEXISNEXIS. Context Judge Analytics. Available at: https://www.lexisnexis.ca/pdf/2021/Context-Getting-Started-EN.pdf. Accessed: 13 July 2025.
MASON, S.; REINIGER, T. S. Trust between machines? Establishing identity between humans and software code, or whether you know it is a dog, and if so, which dog? Computer and Telecommunications Law Review, v. 21, p. 135–143, 2015.
MCGILL, J.; SALYZYN, A. Judging by numbers: how will judicial analytics impact the justice system and its stakeholders? Dalhousie Law Journal, v. 44, n. 1, p. 3–10, 2021.
MINBALEEV, A. V.; EFREMOV, A. A.; DOBROBABA, M. B.; CHUBUKOVA, S. G. Methods and approaches to regulating the emerging industry of quantum communications in the context of the modern information society. Information Society, n. 4, p. 112, 2024.
MEDVEDEVA, M.; WIELING, M.; VOLS, M. Rethinking the field of automatic prediction of court decisions. Artificial Intelligence and Law, v. 31, p. 195–201, 2022.
ORTOLANI, P. The impact of blockchain technologies and smart contracts on dispute resolution: arbitration and court litigation at the crossroads. Uniform Law Review, v. 24, p. 430–446, 2019. DOI: 10.1093/ulr/unz017.
PREDICTICE. Available at: https://predictice.com/fr. Accessed: 13 July 2025.
PREMONITION ANALYTICS. About us. Available at: https://premonition.ai/about-us.
RUSSIA. Federal Law No. 63-FZ “On Electronic Signatures” dated April 6, 2011. Available at: https://base.garant.ru/512184522/. Accessed: 13 July 2025.
SHEHATA, I. Smart contracts & international arbitration. 24 nov. 2018. Disponível em: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3290026. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3290026.
SLATE. France kicks data scientists out of its courts. Available at: https://slate.com/technology/2019/06/france-has-banned-judicial-analytics-to-analyze-the-courts.html. Accessed: 13 July 2025.
SOURDIN, A.; BIN LI MCNAMARA, D. M. Court innovations and access to justice in times of crisis. Health Policy and Technology, v. 9, n. 4, p. 447–451, 2020.
TCC JURIMETRIA. Available at: https://giters.com/jurimetry?ysclid=ldk8dp9c3j655957234. Accessed: 13 July 2025.
THOMSON REUTERS. Evaluate your judge – Litigation Analytics. Available at: https://legal.thomsonreuters.com/en/products/westlaw-edge/litigation-analytics. Accessed: 13 July 2025.
UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME. Assessment Study on Delayed Justice Delivery: Final Report. Available at: https://www.icj.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Final-Report-UNDP-Justice-delays-17072010.pdf. Accessed: 13 July 2025.
UNITED NATIONS. United Nations Convention on the Use of Electronic Communications in International Contracts of 2005. Available at: https://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/conventions/elect_com.shtml?ysclid=md5jlbvv4r439359310. Accessed: 13 July 2025.
UNITED STATES. Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act. Available at: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-106publ229/html/PLAW-106publ229.htm. Accessed: 13 July 2025.
UNITED STATES. Electronic Transactions Act – Uniform Law Commission. Available at: https://www.uniformlaws.org. Accessed: 13 July 2025.
XU, Z. The advance of digital signature with quantum computing. Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology, n. 39, p. 1111–1121, 2023. DOI: 10.54097/hset.v39i.6716.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Não serão devidos direitos autorais ou qualquer outra remuneração pela publicação dos trabalhos.
As opiniões emitidas pelos autores dos artigos e resenhas são de sua exclusiva responsabilidade.
