Comparative Analysis of Mediation Procedures in Kyrgyzstan and Other Countries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52028/rbadr.v7.i13.ART02.KYRKeywords:
Disputes, Mediation, Conflict, Resolution, Alternative Dispute Resolution, ConciliationAbstract
The relevance of the research stems from the need to advance alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, particularly mediation, which faces numerous gaps in both legislative and practical spheres. With the adoption of the Law on Mediation in Kyrgyzstan in 2017, the search for alternative dispute resolution mechanisms and methods has become one of the critical areas in the justice sector to ensure the quality and timely right of citizens to judicial protection. However, given all the socio economic and political circumstances, there are many gaps in the development of mediation as a social practice in Kyrgyzstan: the organization of a market for mediation services, proper legal regulation, incentives to use mediation as a means of conflict resolution, and a set of clear mediation procedures are required. Based on this, the study aims to conduct a comparative analysis of the legislation of Kyrgyzstan and foreign countries in the field of mediation, as well as to compare mediation procedures and their application. The methodological approach in this study is based on the comparative legal method, which is applied to analyse foreign experiences and the practices of Kyrgyzstan, along with the dialectical method. The study examined the institution of mediation in the Kyrgyz Republic and its historical origins. The study explored mediation as an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) method, focusing on its unique aspects in Kyrgyzstan. The authors conducted a comparative legal analysis of the legislation and peculiarities of the mediation procedure in different countries, including the USA, the UK, Germany, China and several other countries (Sweden, Singapore, and the Netherlands). The practical significance of this study is in its potential to influence legislative reforms in Kyrgyzstan, addressing existing gaps in current laws and improving the mediation framework.
References
ABIEV, Y.M., SHERYAZDANOVA, Gulmira R., BYULEGENOVA, Bibigul B., RYSTINA, Idira S., GABDULINA, Beggar A. Mediation in the multicultural society of Kazakhstan: Tradition and moder- nity. Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 14-22, 2020.
BAIMUKHAMETOVA, Guldana, VOYEVODKIN, Denis, MYNZHANOV, Yerlan. Mediation in the Criminal Procedure of Western States: Comparative Legal Analysis. Pakistan Journal of Criminology, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 209-222, 2024. https://doi.org/10.62271/pjc.16.3.209.222
BEKMURATOV, Altynbek, MYRZAIBRAIMOVA, Inabarkan, MAMASHOV, Kanjarbek, RAIMBERDIEV, Bektur, TOOKEEVA, Dilfuza. Impact of leasing transactions on business development in Kyrgyzstan. Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Series Economics, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 21-33, 2024. https://doi.org/10.52566/msu-econ3.2024.21
CARLE, Dominik H. A comparative analysis of mediation by examination and critique of the theory and practice thereof in Germany, Scotland and Switzerland. Glasgow: University of Glasgow, 2015.
CES, Almudena Valiño. Reflections on the viability of mediation as an alternative method of con- flict resolution in Spanish penitentiary centers. Ius et Praxis, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 219-231, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-00122020000200219
Constitution of the Kyrgyz Republic, 2010. Available at: https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/Kyrgyz_Republic_2010
Criminal Procedure Code of the Kyrgyz Republic No. 129, 2021. Available at: https://cbd.minjust.gov.kg/112308/edition/8273/ru
Decree of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan “On the Concept of Foreign Policy of the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2020-2030”, 2020. Available at: https://www.akorda.kz/ru/legal_acts/decrees/o-koncepcii-vneshnei-politiki-respubliki-kazahstan-na-2020-2030-gody
Francis, 2023. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429354625-16
GOLDBERG, Stephen B., SANDER, Frank E., ROGERS, Nancy H., COLE, Sarah R. Dispute resolu- tion: Negotiation, mediation, arbitration, and other processes. Boston: Aspen Publishing, 2020.
HORISLAVSKA, Inna. Correlation of mediation as an alternative way to protect civil rights and interests and tort liability. Law. Human. Environment, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 23-36, 2023. https://doi.org/10.31548/law/1.2023.23
HUTCHINSON, Danielle, LITCHFIELD, Emma-May, BOGACZ, François. Seven keys to unlock media- tion’s golden age: A work by 40 authors from around the world, 2020. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/43768092/SEVEN_KEYS_TO_UNLOCK_MEDIATIONS_G
IGNAT, Claudiu. Brief analysis of the dispute resolution methods through mediation in Romania. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 55-58, 2020. https://doi.org/10.14505//jarle.v10.1(47).07
IMANBAIEV, Serik M., ROMANOVA, Aida H. Comparative legal analysis of the mediation institute under the criminal procedure legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan, the USA, and Great Britain. Criminal Executive System: Yesterday. Today. Tomorrow, vol. 2, no. 10, pp. 35-48, 2021. https://doi.org/10.32755/sjcriminal.2021.02.035
In the near future, the mediation development strategy for the period 2022-2027 will be adopted in Kyrgyzstan, 2022. Available at: https://e-cis.info/news/566/102097/
ISMAILOVA, Rana. An overview of the practice of mediation implementation in the top 5 countries according to the AMRS in the Doing Business rating, 2020. Available at: https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/migration/uz/Mediation_ru.pdf
JAGTENBERG, Rob, DE ROO, Annie, COMBRINK, Lia, PEL, Machteld. Customized conflict resolu- tion: Court-connected mediation in the Netherlands 1999-2009, 2011. Available at: https://www.rechtspraak.nl/SiteCollectionDocuments/Customized-conflict-resolution-Court-connected-Mediation-in-The-Netherlands-1999-2009.pdf
KARIPOVA, Asel I., ROMANOVA, Alina N. Some aspects of the comparative characteristics of me- diation in the USA and the Republic of Kazakhstan. Bulletin of the Academy of Law Enforcement Agencies, vol. 1, pp. 50-58, 2021.
KHAMZINA, Zhanna, BURIBAYEV, Yermek, ALMAGANBETOV, Pernebay, TAZHMAGAMBET, Amantay, SAMALDYKOVA, Zaure, APAKHAYEV, Nurlan. Labor disputes in Kazakhstan: Results of legal regu- lation and future prospects. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1-14, 2020.
KOLSARIEVA, Nazira, Sh., NAZARBAEV, Nursultan A. Some problems of the formation and devel- opment of mediation in the Kyrgyz Republic. News of Universities of Kyrgyzstan, vol. 4, pp. 63-65, 2020.
KRASNOZHON, Neonila. Formation of legal relationship between the Latvian republic and Ukraine in the period of 1992-2019. Society. Document. Communication, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 106-126, 2021. https://doi.org/10.31470/2518-7600-2021-13-106-126
Law of the Kyrgyz Republic No. 161 “On Mediation”, 2017. Available at: https://cbd.minjust.gov.kg/111668/edition/1278996/ru
Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 401-IV “On Mediation”, 2011. Available at: https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/Z1100000401
LEZAK, Stephen, AHEARN, Ariell, MCCONNELL, Fiona, STERNBERG, Troy. Frameworks for conflict mediation in international infrastructure development: A comparative overview and critical appraisal. Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 239, article number 118099, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118099
LOSKUTOV, Tymur, ZAGURSKYY, Oleksandr, OSTAPCHUK, Lyudmila, PUHACH, Anatolii, HADZHIIEVA, Arzu Bakhruz. The role of mediation in the process of resolving criminal cases: Impact on reducing the Burden on the judicial system. Pakistan Journal of Criminology, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 1023-1036, 2024. https://doi.org/10.62271/pjc.16.3.1023.1036
MARION SPENGLER, Fabiana. With hands given to Pollyanna: Mediation under resolution 174 of the superior council of justice of work and labor disputes. Revista Jurídica, vol. 2, no. 69, pp. 375-405, 2022. https://doi.org/10.26668/revistajur.2316-753X.v2i69.2406
MORRIS, Catherine. The impact of mediation on the culture of disputing in Canada: Law schools, lawyers and laws. In: Mediation in Asia-Pacific: A Practical Guide to Mediation and Its Impact on Legal Systems, pp. 67-116. Hong Kong: CCH Hong Kong, 2013.
MURPHY, Tim. Justice and the common good in dispute resolution discourse in the United States and the People’s Republic of China. Law and Development Review, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 305-339, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1515/ldr-2017-0016
MYRZAKHANOVA, Marzhan N., JYMAKAEVA, K.J. Comparative characteristics of national and in- ternational legislation on mediation. Bulletin of the Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 327-332, 2016.
National Development Program of the Kyrgyz Republic until 2026, 2021. Available at: https://cbd.minjust.gov.kg/430700/edition/1096469/ru
NG, Kwai Hang. Wearing two hats: Problems of “in-trial” mediation in China. In: Comparative and Transnational Dispute Resolution (pp. 220–237). London: Taylor and
NGUYEN, Dzung M. Mediation advocacy and investment mediation, 2022. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/92408519/Mediation_Advocacy_and_Investment_Mediatio?sm=b
OCAKLI, Beril, KRUEGER, Tobias, NIEWÖHNER, Jörg. Shades of conflict in Kyrgyzstan: National actor perceptions and behaviour in mining. International Journal of the Commons, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 191-207, 2020.
OLDEN_AGE_A_WORK_BY_40_AUTHORS_FROM_AROUND_THE_WORLD
Order of the President of the People’s Republic of China No. 34 “The people’s mediation law of the People’s Republic of China”, 2010. Available at: https://www.uv.es/medarb/observatorio/leyes-mediacion/asia/china-mediation-law.pdf
OSMONALIEVA, Nazikgul Zh. Family mediation in the Kyrgyz Republic. Science, New Technologies and Innovations of Kyrgyzstan, vol. 11, pp. 158-162, 2019.
PALLAI, Katalin. Participatory approaches to dealing with community conflicts and disputes. Part 1 – Suggesting a consistent taxonomy. In: Municipal Communication, pp. 87-100. Budapest: Corvinus University, 2012.
PODKOVENKO, Tatiana O. Mediation institute: International experience and Ukrainian prospects. In: Collection of scientific papers of the Law Faculty of Ternopil National Economic University, pp. 26-31. Ternopil: Ternopil National Economic University, 2016.
PURWANTI, Ani, SETIAWAN, Fajar Ahmad, NATALIS, Aga. Mediation as dispute resolution in people’s mining. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 1270, no. 1, article number 012010, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1270/1/012010
RUBANOV, Sergey A., KUKSIN, Ivan N., MIKHAILIK, Anna A., SHALAJKIN, Ruslan N., ZAJCEV, Vasilij A. Development of the institute of mediation in the countries of the Commonwealth of Independent States. Res Militaris, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 4072-4078, 2022.
RYSKALIYEV, Dauletbai U., ZHAPAKOV, Sabyrzhan M., APAKHAYEV, Nurlan, MOLDAKHMETOVA, Zhanar, BURIBAYEV, Yermek A., KHAMZINA, Zhanna A. Issues of gender equality in the workplace: The case study of Kazakhstan. Space and Culture, India, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 15-26, 2019. https://doi.org/10.20896/saci.v7i2.450
SERIKZHANOVA, Aigerim, NURTAZINA, Roza, SERIKZHANOVA, Inabat, BUKHARBAY, Bolat, TAITORINA, Binur. Evolving Political Cultures in Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Kyrgyzstan: Trends and New Paradigms. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 1-24, 2024. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/1914
SHERANOVA, Arzuu. The interplay between formal and informal in conflict prevention, mediation and community security provision in Kyrgyzstan. In: Transformation and Development. Cham: Springer, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42775-7_8
SOARES FILHO, Sidney, CICHOBŁAZIŃSKI, Leszek. Collective dispute resolution with mediation: Poland and Brazil differences. Revista Juridica, vol. 5, no. 67, pp. 457-468, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.26668/revistajur.2316-753X.v5i67.5265
SPYTSKA, Liana. Analysis of the most unusual court decisions in the world practice in terms of the right to justice. Social and Legal Studios, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 39-45, 2022. https://doi.org/10.32518/2617-4162-2022-5-4-39-45
STA LAW FIRM. Comparative analysis of ADR methods with focus on their advantages and disad- vantages, 2019. Available at: https://www.mondaq.com/arbitration--dispute-resolution/777618/comparative-analysis-of-adr-methods-with-focus-on-their-advantages-and-disadvantages
Statistics of mediation in Kazakhstan. Association of mediators, 2024a. Available at: https://mediator.kz/o-nas/news/statistika-provedeniya-mediacij-v-kazahstane
Statistics of mediation in the world. Association of mediators, 2024b. Available at: https://mediator.kz/o-nas/news/statistika-provedeniya-mediacij-v-mire
The judicial system contributes to the development of commercial mediation in the Kyrgyz Republic, 2023. Available at: https://danaker.org/ru/tag/медиация-ru/
TINISTANOVA, Saltanat. Some current problems of mediation in the Republic of Kazakhstan. The Scientific Heritage, vol. 78, pp. 28-30, 2021. https://doi.org/10.24412/9215-0365-2021-78-5-28-30
TOKBAEVA, Albina A., KOZHOYAROVA, Gulsina J., KURBANOVA, Chinara J. Mediation in civil proceedings, 2023. Available at: http://admin-vshp.sot.kg/public/sites/3/2019/11/metodich-eskoe-posobie-mediatsiya-dlya-sudej-okon.-1.pdf
TYMCHENKO, Ruslana, IVASHCHENKO, Andriy. Theoretical analysis of the concept of “pedagogical technologies” in the context of educational activities. Society. Document. Communication, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 345-358, 2021. https://doi.org/10.31470/2518-7600-2021-13-345-358
Uniform Mediation Act, 2001. Available at: http://intermediation.narod.ru/index/0-35
URBAEVA, Zhyldyz, LEE, Eunju, LEE, Yeonggeul. Reproductive decisions as mediators between education and employment of women in Kyrgyzstan. Health Care for Women International, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 898-913, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2019.1609963
US vs UK – A comparison of mediation processes, 2017. Available at: https://www.skuld.com/topics/legal/pi-and-defence/us-vs-uk---a-comparison-of-mediation-processes/
VILKS, Andrejs, KIPANE, Aldona. Economic crime as a category of criminal research. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 2860-2867, 2018. https://doi.org/10.14505/jarle.v9.8(38).35
YANYSHIVSKYI, Mykhailo. Regulation of artificial intelligence in Ukraine in the framework of har- monisation of legislation with EU legal norms. Democratic Governance, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 53-62, 2024. https://doi.org/10.23939/dg2024.53
YESSENBEKOVA, Patima. Results of implementation of conciliation procedures in civil procee- dings. Social and Legal Studios, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 95-102, 2024. https://doi.org/10.32518/sals3.2024.95
YUWEN, Li. The judicial system and reform in Post-Mao China: Stumbling towards justice. Abingdon: Routledge Press, 2014.
ZHAVDOTOVA, Sabina. Institute of mediation in criminal procedures. Journal of Innovations in Social Sciences, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 47-50, 2021.
ZHETPISBAYEV, Batyrbek A., BAISALOVA, Gulzira T., SHADIYEV, Kairatbek Kh., KHAMZIN, Amangeldy Sh., BURIBAYEV, Yermek A., KHAMZINA, Zhanna A. Legal support of the process of Kazakhstan accession to the OECD: Potential for improving quality of individual’s labour rights regulation. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 2302-2307, 2017. https://doi.org/10.14505//jarle.v8.7(29).31
ZIENKIEWICZ, Adam. Objectives of mediation and selection and implementation of mediation strategies and techniques by mediators in civil disputes – Study report (Part III – Interviews). Studia Iuridica Lublinensia, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 303-332, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/sil.2023.32.2.303-332
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista Brasileira de Alternative Dispute Resolution - Brazilian Journal of Alternative Dispute Resolution - RBADR

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
No royalties or other compensation shall be due for the publication of the works.
The opinions expressed by the authors of the articles and reviews are their sole responsibility.